Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Bail Application No.361 of 2025 Desh Deepak Shrivastava …..….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand
….….Respondent Present:- Ms. Gurbani Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, Deputy Advocate General for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
The applicant is in judicial custody in Charge- Sheet No.01 of 2021 dated 19.07.2021, under Sections 420, 409, 120-B IPC and Section 3 of The Uttarakhand Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 2005 and FIR No.72 of 2019, dated 07.05.2019, under Sections 420, 406, 120-B IPC, Police Station Bageshwar, District Bageshwar. He has sought his release on bail.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3.
It is argued that the co-accused having similar role has already been granted bail.
4.
This fact is admitted by the learned State counsel.
2
5.
Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
6.
The bail application is allowed.
7.
Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.)
03.03.2025 Sanjay