Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31426 (CHH)

HARISHANKAR VAIBHAV v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3064/2020 · 2025-04-28

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:19102 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3064 of 2020 • Harishankar Vaibhav S/o Shri Ram Prasad Aged About 44 Years Working As Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Malda, R/o Ward No. 04, Ramayan Chowk, Village And Block- Malda, District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Department Of Agriculture And Farmer Welfare And Bio- Technology, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, P.O.- Rakhi, Tehsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Pin 492101 2. The Director, Department Of Fisheries, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, P.O. Rakhi, Tehsil And District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. The District Collector Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 4. The Assistant Director Department Of Fisheries, District- Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh 5. The District Fisheries Officer Department Of Fisheries, District- Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh 6. The President Kewat Machhuwara Sahkari Samiti, Block-Jaijaipur, District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 7. The Commissioner, Bilaspur Division District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Sameer Behar, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 to 5 & 7/State For Respondent No. 6 : : Mr. Lav Sharma, Panel Lawyer Mr. Hemant Gupta, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 28/04/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 “10.1 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire record of the case. 10.2 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside the impugned order dated 07.03.2020 (Annexure P-1) issued by the respondent no. 03 so far as the aforesaid Nanki Talab is concerned, in the interest of justice. 10.3 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to pass any other order as it may deem fit, in the interest of justice.” 2. Mr. Sameer Behar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner pleads no instruction. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Howerver, the petitioner would be at liberty to revive his prayer, if cause of action still survives. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti