Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31426 (AP)

GANJI BHUSHNAM v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/23986/2025 · 2025-09-09

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

£ ^ APHC010459692025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23986 OF 2025 Between: Ganji Bhushnam, S/o Ganji Panama Jyothi.Aged about 45 years R/o,D/No.6-6, Patha Ambarupeta, Amberpeta, Bhimadole Mandal, Eluru District ...Petitioner AND 1. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home at Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District 2. The Superintendent of Police, Eluru, Eluru District. 3. The Circle Inspector of Police, Bhimadole ,Bhimadole Mandal Eluru District., 4. The Sub Inspector of Police, Bhimadole Police Station, Bhimadole Eluru District. 5. Mallula Satyanarayana, S/o Venkateswara Rao, Aged about 55 years R/o, Amberpeta Village, Bhimadole Mandal, Eluru District 6. Mallula Krishna, S/o Venkateswara Rao, Aged about 41 years, R/o, Amberpeta Village, Bhimadole Mandal, Eluru District 7. Mallula Suryanaryana, S/o Venkateswara Rao, Aged about 45 years, R/o, Amberpeta Village, Bhimadole Mandal,E Eluru District 8. Tadichettu Veeramma, W/o Yedukondalu, Aged about 45 years, R/o Amberpeta Village, Bhimadole Mandal, Eluru District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No. 3 and 4 in calling the petitioner to Police Station frequently to settle the civil disputes between the petitioner and respondents 5 to 8 and also not allowing the petitioner to enter into his Schedule property in Sy.No. 517/1 for an extent of Ac.0.72 Cents, situated in Amberpata Revenue Village, Bhimadole Mandal, Eluru District (Erst While West Godavari District), at the instance of the respondents 5 to 8 is illegal, arbitrary, and without having jurisdiction and violation of Art 14,21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and to consequently direct the Respondent No. 3 and 4 not to interfere with the Civil disputes between the petitioner and the Respondents 5 to 8 and also not to call the petitioner to Police Station. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the Respondent No. 3 and 4 not to interfere with Civil disputes between the petitioner and respondents 5 to 8 in respect of Schedule property in Sy.No. 517/1 for an extent of Ac.0.72 Cents, situated in Amberpata Revenue Village, Bhimadole Mandal, Eluru District (Erst While West Godavari District), pending disposal of W.P. No of 2025 pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VARDHINEEDI SAI KIRAN Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5 to 8: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following/ APHC010459692025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23986/2025 Between: 1.GANJI BHUSHNAM, S/0 GANJI PANAMA JYOTHI.AGED ABOUT 45 R/0,D/N0.6-6, PATHA AMBARUPETA. AMBERPETA, YEARS BHIMADOLE MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS DEPARTMENT OF HOME AT PRINCIPAL SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT. 3.THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BHIMADOLE .BHIMADOLE MANDAL ELURU DISTRICT., 4.THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, BHIMADOLE POLICE STATIONL BHIMADOLE ELURU DISTRICT. 5.MALLULA SATYANARAYANA, S/0 VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT 6.MALLULA KRISHNA, S/0 VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS ELURU DISTRICT 7.MALLULA SURYANARYANA, S/0 VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED R/0, AMBERPETA VILLAGE, BHIMADOLE SECRETARY, R/0, AMBERPETA VILLAGE, BHIMADOLE R/O, AMBERPETA VILLAGE, BHIMADOLE MANDAL, ABOUT 45 YEARS MANDAL,E ELURU DISTRICT 8.TADICHETTU VEERAMMA, W/0 YEDUKONDALU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O AMBERPETA VILLAGE, BHIMADOLE MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT{S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.VARDHINEEDI SAI KIRAN 1 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: II This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: 2 to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No. 3 and 4 in calling the petitioner to Police Station frequently to settle the civil disputes between the petitioner and respondents 5 to 8 and also not allowing the petitioner to enter into his Schedule property in Sy.No. 517/1 for an extent of Ac.0.72 Cents, situated in Amberpata Revenue Village, Bhimadole Mandal, Eluru District (Erst While West Godavari District), at the instance of the respondents 5 to 8 is illegal, arbitrary, and without having jurisdiction and violation of Art 14,21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and to consequently direct the Respondent No. 3 and 4 not to interfere with the Civil Respondents 5 to 8 and also not to call the petitioner to Police Station.” disputes between the petitioner and the 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that basing on the complaint of the respondent No.5, the police have registered a case against the petitioner herein and six others in Crime No.288 of 2023 of Bhimadole Police Station, for the offences punishable under Sections 447 and 506 read with 34 IPC. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed to follow due process of law regarding the crime registered against the petitioner. The police are further directed not to interfere in the civil 3. disputes between the parties. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. Sd/- T. SRINIVASA RAO assistant registrar //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, Department of Home at Secretariat, 1. The Principal Secretary, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District 2. The Superintendent of Police, Eluru, Eluru District. The Circle Inspector of Police, Bhimadole .Bhimadole Mandal Eluru District., The Sub Inspector of Police, Bhimadole Police Station, Bhimadole Eluru District. One CC to Sri. Vardhineedi Sai Kiran, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP For Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] Two CD Copies. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. AL % HIGH COURT DATED: 10/09/2025 ORDER WP NO. 23986 OF 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS