APHC010459442025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADES AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 0E0 TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 23972 OF 2025 Between: Dontapati Eswaramma,, W/o. D.Venkatasubba Reddy, aged about 59 years, Occ Cultivation, R/o. D.N0.1/57-B, Busireddipalle Village, Chinthakommadinne Mandal, YSR Kadapa District ...Petitioner AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its PrI. Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi Amaravathi, Guntur District. The District Collector, Collectorate, Kadapa City, YSR Kadapa District. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kadapa City, YSR kadapa District. The Tahsildar, Chintha Komma Dinne Mandal, YSR Kadapa District. 1. 2. 3. 4. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents, in including the petitioner's land, admeasuring Ac. 1-34 cents, out of an extent of Ac. 1-37 cents in Sy. No. 195 of Papasahebpeta Revenue Village, Chintha Komma Dinne Mandal, YSR Kadapa District in list of prohibited properties, under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908, as illegal, unjust, arbitrary. voilative of Articles 14, 300-A of the Constitution of India, contrary to law, void and consequently the respondents be directed to delete the land, ^ admealyl^g, Ac. 1-34 cents, out of an extent of Ac. 1-37 cents in Sy. No. ' 195 of Papasahebpeta Revenue Village, Chintha Komma Dinne Mandal, YSR Kad,apa District from the prohibited properties list, under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908, by considering AP Online application NO.TTAOI2500127411 / Transaction ID TATTA 012500127411 dated 14.02.2025, forthwith, by further directing the respondent - authorities to grant / issue Title Deed- Cum- Pattar Pass Book for the land stated supra, in favour of the petitioner. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to delete the land, admeasuring Ac. 1-34 cents, out of an extent of Ac. 1-37 cents in Sy. No. 195 of Papasahebpeta Revenue Village, Chintha Komma Dinne Mandal, YSR Kadapa District from the prohibited property list, under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908, by considering AP Online application N0.TTAOI2500127411 / Transaction ID TATTA 012500127411 dated 14.02.2025, forthwith, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S V MUNI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : APHC010459442025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] p-- Sk ■Ji:? TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 23972/2025 Between: 1.DONTAPATI ESWARAMMA,, W/0. D.VEN KATAS UB BA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/0. VILLAGE, CHINTHAKOMMADINNE MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER BUSIREDDIPALLE D.N0.1/57-B, AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI,GUNTURDISTRICT. 2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, KADAPA CITY, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 3.THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KADAPA CITY, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4.THE TAHSILDAR, CHINTHA KOMMA DINNE MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents, in including the petitioner's land, admeasuring Ac. 1-34 cents, out of an extent of Ac. 1-37 cents in Sy. No. 195 of Papasahebpeta Revenue Village, Chintha Komma Dinne Mandal, YSR Kadapa District in list of prohibited properties, under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908, as illegal, unjust, arbitrary, voilative of Articles 14, 300-A of the Constitution of India, contrary to law, void and consequently the respondents be directed to delete the land, admeasuring, Ac. 1-34 cents, out of an extent of Ac. 1-37 cents in Sy. No. 195 of Papasahebpeta Revenue Village, Chintha Komma Dinne Mandal, YSR Kadapa District from the prohibited properties list, under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908, by considering AP Online application No.TTAOI2500127411 / Transaction ID TATTA 012500127411 dated 14.02.2025, forthwith, by further directing the respondent - authorities to grant / issue Title 2 Deed- Cum- Pattar Pass Book for the land stated supra, in favour of the petitioner lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to delete the land, admeasuring Ac. 1-34 cents, out of an extent of Ac. 1- 37 cents in Sy. No. 195 of Papasahebpeta Revenue Village, Chintha Komma Dinne Mandal, YSR Kadapa District from the prohibited property list, under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908, by considering AP Online application N0.TTAOI2500127411 / Transaction TATTA 012500127411 dated 14.02.2025, forthwith, pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: ID 1.S VMUNI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE ,/ 3 € THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.23972 of 2025 ORDER:- Pithily, this writ petition is filed on the ground that application bearing N0.TTAOI2500127411 dated 14.02.2025, was made to the authorities, but it was not addressed. Therefore, it is urged that the respondents be directed to address the application, as such direction would suffice in the circumstances of the case. The Hon’ble Apex Court in The Government of India vs P. Venkatesh^ held as follows; 2. “...Dispose of the representation mantra is increasingly permeating the judicial process in the High Courts and the Tribunals. Such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not service to the cause of justice. The litigant is back again before the Court, as this case shows, having incurred attendant costs and suffered delays of the legal process. This would have been obviated by calling for a counter in the first instance, thereby resulting in finality to the dispute...” This Court is not oblivious of the fact that a Court to authorities. 3. before directing "consideration" of a claim or representation should examine whether the claim or representation is with reference to a live" issue or whether it is with reference to a "dead" or "stale" issue. stale" issue or dispute, the If it is with reference to a "dead" or Court/tribunal should put an end to the matter and should not direct (2019) 15 see 613 4 consideration or reconsideration. If the Court to tribunal deciding to direct "consideration" without itself examining the merits, it should make it clear that such consideration will be without prejudice to any contention relating to limitation or delay and laches. Even if the court does not expressly say so, that would be the legal position and effect." Disposal of proceedings by seemingly innocuous orders directing consideration of representation tho,ugh result in quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions but such orders do more disservice than service to the cause of justice. 4. However, the respondents are directed that the petitioner’s application bearing No.TTA012500127411 dated 14.02.2025 be considered by examining thoroughly, issue orders accordingly, and communicate the decision to the petitioner. It goes without saying that the entire process will be completed within six (06) weeks from the 5. date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no 6. order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any. shall stand closed. Sd/- SRI T SRINIVASA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The PrI. Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Andhra Pradesh Secretariat, Velagapudi Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Collectorate, Kadapa City, YSR Kadapa District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kadapa City, YSR kadapa District. 4. The Tahsildar, Chintha Komma Dinne Mandal, YSR Kadapa District. 5. One CC to Sri. S V Muni Reddy Advocate [QPUC] 6. TwoCCsto GP for Revenue High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 7. Two CD Copies gsc HIGH COURT DATED:09/09/2025 ORDER WP NO. 23972 OF 2025 DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS