Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31420 (JHR)

BEHRA ALIAS AMRIT SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./94/2025 · 2025-01-16

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.94 of 2025 ------ Behra @ Amrit Singh, aged about 21 years, Son of Jitu Singh @ Gudgudiya Singh, Resident of: Jainamore Ghatwar Tola, near Maszid, Post Office-Jaridih, Police Station: Jaridih, District-Bokaro. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Swami Nath Prasad Rai, Advocate : Mr. Ranjan Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanat Kr. Jha, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 16/01/2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest in connection with Jaridih P.S. Case No.44 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. No.419 of 2024 instituted under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 325, 307, 385, 379 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was a member of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of the common object of the assembly attempted to murder Manoranjan Kumar Singh. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner. It is next submitted that the co-accused persons have already been given the privileges of anticipatory bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 12.08.2024 in A.B.A. No.5045 of 2024 and A.B.A. No.5022 of 2024 dated 09.08.2024. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the investigation of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing cash security of Rs.10,000/- and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Bermo at Tenughat in connection with Jaridih P.S. Case No.44 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. No.419 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/