Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3142 (AP)

D ROHAN REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/3036/2025 · 2025-08-31

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

**fc*a:.*c^ APHC010011912025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 3036 OF 2025 Between: D. Rohan Reddy, S/o. D.Srimananarayana Reddy, Aged about 24 years, R/o. D.No. 19-13-1/12, Narayanapuram, Tiruchanoor Road, Tirupati Urban Mandal, Tirupati. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 2. The District Collector, Tirupati, Tirupati District, Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Tirupati Municipal Corporation, Rep by its Commissioner, Tilak Road, Tirupati, Tirupati District. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupati, Tirupati District. 5. The Tahsildar, Tirupati, Tirupati Urban Mandal. ...Respondents ■; Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos. 2 in not passing orders on the recommendation report given by the Respondent No.5 to Respondent No.2 vide Proceedings No.Roc.A/404/2022, dated 08.06.2023 basing on the m ^ Petitioners mee-seva application vide TATTA012200087697 dated 30.05.2022 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No. 2 to remove the Petitioners property situated in Town Survey No.4087, Municipal Ward No. 13, Peddakapu Veedhi, Tirupati to an extent of 116.2 percent Sq. Yards from the prohibitory list under section 22-A(1)(b) of the Registration Act, 1908 in the interest of justice. / lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No. 2 to pass orders on the recommendation report given by the Respondent No.5 to Respondent No.2 vide Proceedings No.Roc.A/404/2022, dated 08.06.2023 basing on the Petitioner’s mee-seva application vide TATTA012200087697 dated 30.05.2022. ,y /"I Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V. ESWARAIAH CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1, 4 & 5 : GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3 : SRI POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC FOR MUNICIPALITY / The Court made the following order: APHC010011912025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] m MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 3036/2025 Between; 1.D.ROHAN REDDY, S/O.D.SRIMANANARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, R/0 D.NO. 19-13-1/12, NARAYANAPURAM, TIRUCHANOOR ROAD, TIRUPATI URBAN MANDAL, TIRUPATI ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 3.THE TIRUPATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP BY ITS TILAK ROAD, TIRUPATI TIRUPATI TIRUPATI COMMISSIONER, DISTRICT 4.THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT 5.THE TAHSILDAR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI URBAN MANDAL. ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.2 in not passing orders on the recommendation report given by the Respondent No.5 to Respondent No.2 vide Proceedings No.Roc.A/404/2022, dated 08.06.2023 basing on the Petitioners mee- seva application vide TATTA012200087697 dated 30.05.2022 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No. 2 to remove the Petitioners property situated in Town Survey No.4087, Municipal Ward No. 13, Peddakapu Veedhi, Tirupati to an extent of J 2 116.2 percent Sq. Yards from the prohibitory list under section 22- A(1)(b) of the Registration Act, 1908 in the interest of justice and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No.2 to pass orders on the recommendation report given by the Respondent No.5 to Respondent No.2 vide Proceedings No.Roc.A/404/2022, dated 08.06.2023 basing on the Petitioner’s mee- seva application vide TATTA012200087697 dated 30.05.2022 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1 .V ESWARAIAH CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.POTHAM VENGALA REDDY, SC for Municipal Corporation in Rayalaseema region 2.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 '4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 3036 of 2025 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed aggrieved by the action of the respondents in not passing the orders on the recommendation report given by the 5*^ respondent to 2"'' respondent vide proceedings in Roc.A/404/2022, dated 08.06.2023 issued on the petitioner’s mee-seva application No.TATTA0122000087697, dated 30.05.2022. 2. The learned Assistant Government Pleader has placed the proceedings dated 08.02.2025 of the 5*'’ respondentTTahsildar, which manifests that the 5“^ respondent/Tahsildar has submitted report to the 2 respondent/District Collector vide Roc.A/404/2022, dated 08.06.2023 and the same is under enquiry. nd 3. In view of the same, without going into merits of the case, this Court is inclined to dispose of this writ petition directing the 2 respondent/District Collector to examine the report submitted by the 5 respondent/Tahsildar as expeditiously as possible not later than six weeks from the date of the order is received and communicate the said decision to the petitioner herein. nd th 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. no Sd/- KJ.RAJA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue. State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi Pradesh. Guntur District, Andhra 4 The District Collector, Tirupati, Tirupati District, Andhra Pradesh. The Commissioner, Tirupati Municipal Corporation, Tilak Road, Tirupati Tirupati District. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupati, Tirupati District^ The Tahsildar, Tirupati, Tirupati Urban Mandal. One CC to Sri V. Eswaraiah Chowdary, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri Potham Vengala Reddy, SC for Municipality [OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] Two CD Copies 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Cnr HIGH COURT DATED:01/09/2025 ORDER WP NO. 3036 OF 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS