1 2025:CGHC:32471-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2177 of 2025 Upendra Kumar Sahu S/o Jagdish Prasad Sahu Aged About 36 Years R/o - Flat No. 01, Mahaveer Apartment, Ayodhaya By Pass, Near Sagar Kambage, Police Station - Ayodhaya Nagar, Bhopal, District - Bhopal (M.P.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station - Mahila Thana, Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Smt. Rajnandani Sahu W/o Upendra Kumar Sahu Aged About 31 Years D/o Kailash Prasad Sahu, R/o - House No. 137, Floral City, Dunda, Police Station - Mujgahan, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from CIS) For Petitioner : Mr. Shivendu Pandya, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Mr. Hariom Rai, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Judgment on Board SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2025.07.15 10:41:22 +0530 2 Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 14/07/2025 1. Heard Mr. Shivendu Pandya, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Hariom Rai, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents/ State. 2. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:- “I. That the Hon'le Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the Criminal Case No. 1259/2025 pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) for kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court. II. That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to pass an order to quash the charge sheet against the present applicant for the offence punishable under section 498(A) of Indian Penal Code and the Criminal Case No. 1259/2025 pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur, District -Raipur (C.G.) in the interest of the Justice. III. Any other relief may also be granted to the applicants which this Hon'ble Court deems fit in facts and circumstances of the case.” 3. At the time of hearing, this Court has observed that the petitioner has filed the present petition without appropriate prayer which is defective one, therefore, we are not inclined to entertain the present petition with such a vague and sketchy prayer to which learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh with proper prayer. 4. Learned State counsel has no objection. 3 5. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for subject to depositing a sum of Rs. 2,000/- as cost by the petitioner in the Registry of this Court and the said amount shall be transmitted to the Government Multi- Disabled Home, Village Pendri, District- Janjgir- Champa (C.G.). 6. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner/ State after obtaining the photocopy of the same. - Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice $ Bhilwar/ Jyoti