Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31405 (PNJ)

TAMANNA BABBAR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

CWP/6680/2025 · 2025-04-01

Sudhir Singh, Sukhvinder Kaur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-6680-2025 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-6680-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 01.04.2025 Tamanna Babbar ......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Present: Mr. Nishant Maini, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG, Haryana. Ms. Saanvi Singla, Advocate, for Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2 and 3-HSVP. *** SUDHIR SINGH (ORAL) By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has sought issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to hand over the physical possession of plot No.NH2 (Nursing Home site)in Sector 45, Urban Estate, Gurugram II, after completion of development works, including road, water supply, Sewerage & Storm Water etc. AJAY PRASHER 2025.04.04 10:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-6680-2025 (O&M) -2- 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of her grievance, the petitioner shall approach the competent authority by filing an appropriate representation. 3. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3 submits that if, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the same shall be considered and decided by the competent authority, in accordance with law. 4. Without commenting on merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate representation before the competent authority-respondent No.3 (Estate Officer-II, HSVP, Gurugram). The respondent No.3 is directed to look into the grievance/representation of the petitioner and pass an appropriate reasoned order on the said representation, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of filing/receipt of such representation. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE 01.04.2025 Ajay Prasher Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No AJAY PRASHER 2025.04.04 10:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document