1 2025:CGHC:32486 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3590 of 2025 1 - M/s. N.R. Marketings 15, New Panchsheel Nagar, Civil Lines, Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Through Authorised Partner - Mr. Navratan Bhattad S/o Shri P. R. Bhattad, Aged About 48 Years, R/o 15, New Panchsheel Nagar, Civil Lines, Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary, Chhattisgarh Revenue And Disaster Management Department, S-2-48, Mahandi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Raipur, Tahsil And District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India, Pin-492001 2 - Chief Judicial Magistrate (Acting Under Ministrial/ Administrative Capacity U/s 14 Of The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act 2002 (S.A.R.F.A.E.S.I. Act), District Court Premises, Raipur, Tahsil And District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India, Pin-492001 3 - Tahsildar Raipur, Tahsil And District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India, Pin-492001 4 - M/s. Authum Investment And Infrastructure Limited (A Company Registered Under Company Act 1956), (C.I.N. - L51109mh1982plc319008), Having Its Registered Address - 707, Raheja Centre, Free Press Journal Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India, Pin - 400021 5 - M/s. Reliance Commercial Finance Limited (A Company Registered Under Company Act 1956 Having Company Identification No. U66010mh2000plc128301), Reliance Centre, 6th Floor, South Wing, Off-Western Express Highway, Santacruz (East), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India Pin 400055 6 - Branch Manager M/s. Reliance Commercial Finance Limited, Having Their Branch 2 Office At 3rd Floor, Simran Tower, Opposite L.I.C. Building, Pandri, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India. Pin-492001 --- Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raj Kamal Singh through VC along with Mr. Suryapratap Yuddhveer Singh, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Soumitra Kesharwani, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 14/07/2025 1. By way of the instant petition the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may please be kind enough in calling the entire records pertaining to the impugned orders. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may please be kind enough in directing the respondents to drop all the recovery proceedings in relation to the time barred loan Agreement No. RLCPRAI000042308 Rs. 58,71,390/- and the loan agreement no. RLCPRAI000042289 Rs. 66,28,610/- between petitioner and respondent no. 5. 10.3 That, this Hon’ble Court may please be kind enough in restricting the respondents from disturbind the peaceful possession of the petitioners and its partners/guarantor over their residence bearing House No. 18, Plot No. 18, Municipal House No. 42/18, New Panchsheel Nagar, Raipur, C.G. 3 10.4 The cost and any other relief deemed fit may please also be granted in favour of the petitioner.” 2. On perusal of the prayer in the present petition, it transpires that the present petition is drafted with the prayer which is defective one, therefore, I am not inclined to entertain the present petition with such a vague and sketchy prayer as there are no documents placed on record, to which learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with a liberty to file better constituted petition with all relevant documents. 3. Learned State counsel has no objection. 4. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 5. Certified copy of the documents may be returned back to the petitioner after retaining a photocopy of the same. SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE Madhurima