Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31400 (RAJ)

ANITA GOYAL WIFE OF YASHWANT GOYAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/6322/2025 · 2025-09-26

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:39922] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6322/2025 1. Anita Goyal Wife Of Yashwant Goyal, Resident Of Bhopal Bypass Road, Aklera District Jhalawar. 2. Chirag Goyal Son Of Yashwant Goyal, Resident Of Bhopal Bypass Road, Aklera, District Jhalawar. 3. Yashwant Goyal Son Of Mohan Lal, Resident Of Bhopal Bypass Road, Aklera, District Jhalawar. ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mayank Kumar Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vikek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 26/09/2025 1. Amended cause title produced by the petitioner is taken on record. 2. It has been stated that all three petitioners have been summoned by the trial Court by issuance of arrest warrants, to record their statements in the proceedings of Criminal Case No.367/2015 titled as State of Rajasthan Versus Rajesh Saxena & Ors., pending before the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chumela, District Jhalawar. 3. It has been pointed out that petitioner No.3 is complainant in the present criminal case and petitioner Nos.1 and 2 are witnesses. 4. Having considered the contentions made by counsel for petitioners and in view of the fact that the purpose of trial Court to [2025:RJ-JP:39922] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6322/2025] issue arrest warrants against the petitioners is to procure their presence in order to proceed in Criminal Case No.397/2015 and once, petitioners themselves are ready and agreeable to appear before the trial Court, it is not desirable to execute the arrest warrants. 5. Accordingly, petitioners are granted opportunity to appear before the trial Court on the next date or on or before 30.10.2025 or whenever called by trial Court and in the meanwhile, execution of the arrest warrants issued by the trial Court against the petitioners in the present criminal case shall remain stayed. 6. With the aforesaid observations, instant petition is disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending applications(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J pcg/278