SRI. SHRIPAD S/O VARADESHWAR HEGDE v. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
WP/100574/2024 · 2025-01-16
M Nagaprasanna
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3140 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3140 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:664 WP No. 100574 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025
BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO. 100574 OF 2024 (S-REG)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. SHRIPAD S/O VARADESHWAR HEGDE AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
2. SRI. ISHWAR S/O. NARAYAN NAIK AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
3. SRI. JANARDHAN S/O. NINGAPPA NAIK AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
4. SRI. ANIL S/O VISHRAM NAIK AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
5. SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR S/O. GOVIND NAIK AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
6. SRI. SHIVARAJ S/O. CHANNABASAPPA PATTED AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
ALL ARE WORKING AT OFFICE OF DEPUTY DIRECTOR SERICULTURE ZILLA PANCHAYAT, SIRSI, DIST. U.K.-581401. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI RAVI HEGDE, ADVOCATE)
VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.01.21 11:27:13 +0530
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:664 WP No. 100574 of 2024
AND:
1. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF SERICULTURE, VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, SERICULTURE DEVELOPMENT AND DIRECTOR OF SERICULTURE, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, SERICULTURE, ZILLA PANCHAYAT, SIRSI, DIST. U.K.-581401. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTILATHA R. PATIL, HCGP)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO, ISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO REGULARIZE THE SERVICES OF THE PETITIONERS FROM THE DATE WHEN THEY COMPLETE THE 10 YEARS OF SERVICES WITH ALL FINANCIAL BENEFITS, BY FIXING OUTER LIMIT & ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:664 WP No. 100574 of 2024
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)
1. The petitioners are before this Court seeking a direction by issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus to regularize their services from the date on which they completed 10 years of service with all consequential benefits. 2. Heard the learned counsel Sri.Ravi Hegde appearing for the petitioners and the learned HCGP for the respondent- State. 3. The petitioners along with several others are said to have been engaged as daily wage employees with effect from
15.10.1984. The learned counsel would take this Court through a document appended to the petition which is dated 23.08.2023, by which the employees were appointed on daily wages along with the petitioners during the same period, have been regularized.
In the wake of the regularization of those employees by the State, the petitioners submit representation seeking parity in treatment qua regularization of the present petitioners as well. The said representation has not yet met its
- 4 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:664 WP No. 100574 of 2024
consideration. It is therefore the petitioners are at the doors of this Court.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are also entitled to the same treatment/benefit that is given to several other employees who are appointed along with the petitioners.
5. A perusal of the order dated 23.08.2023 is in vindication of the submission of the counsel in the writ petition.
6. The learned HCGP would submit that if reasonable time is granted, the representation of the petitioners would meet its consideration and appropriate orders will be passed in accordance with law.
7. In the light of the said submission, I deem it appropriate to dispose the petition directing consideration of cases of petitioners for regularization of their services as is done in terms of the order dated 23.08.2023 vide Annexure-D to the petition and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within an outer limit of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order, if not earlier.
- 5 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:664 WP No. 100574 of 2024
8. Any documents necessary from the hands of the petitioners shall be solicited and petitioners shall submit the same to the respondents for the aforesaid consideration.
9. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
KGK/VP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 41