Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3140 (ALL)

MOIN AHMAD AND ANOTHER v. MUKUL ANAND PANDEY (DISTRICT BASIC EDUCATION OFFICER, SONBHADRA)

CAPL/5066/2025 · 2026-05-05

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 5066 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. Pursuant to the earlier order, Shri Mukul Anand Pandey, District Basic Education Officer, Sonbhadra and Shri Surendra Kumar Tiwari, Secretary, U.P. Board of Basic Education, Prayagraj are present in the Court today, who are identified by Shri Yatindra, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party. Compliance affidavits have been filed today by both the officers, which are taken on record. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned counsel for the opposite party fairly states that the order of the writ Court has been complied and the representation has been decided on 01.05.2026, copy of which has been annexed as Annexure No. 1 to the compliance affidavit. 3. In view of the said fact, as the order of the writ Court has been complied with, the contempt application rendered infructuous and stands dismissed. 4. Contempt notice stands discharged. May 6, 2026 A. V. Singh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Samarath Singh, Sankalp Narain Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Yatindra (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Moin Ahmad And Another .....Applicant(s) Mukul Anand Pandey (District Basic Education Officer, Sonbhadra) .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad