Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31391 (KAR)

SRI P.P. RAVINDRAKUMAR v. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BOARD

WP/22208/2024 · 2025-06-10

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19814 WP No. 22208 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 22208 OF 2024 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN: SRI. P.P. RAVINDRAKUMAR, S/O LATE P.V. PALANIVELU MODALIYAR, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.57/2, I FLOOR, III MAIN, RAJANNA COLONY, BASAVANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 032. PRESENTLY RESIDING AT SAI RAM AMUDHARAJ ACME, FLAT NO.T-F-1, 3RD FLOOR, R.K. MUTT ROAD, HALASURU, BENGALURU - 560 008. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY T, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BOARD RASTROTHARA PARISHAT BUILDING, NO.14/3, 2ND FLOOR, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER. 2. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19814 WP No. 22208 of 2024 OFFICER (METRO) PHASE-1 KIADB, NO.14/3, 1ST FLOOR R.P. BUILDING, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001. 3. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, BENGALURU METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD., BMTC COMPLEX, 3RD FLOOR, K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 027. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. MONICA PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2; SRI. N.N. HARISH, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 AND 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 03.07.2023 AND TO WITHDRAW THE DEFECTIVE AWARD DATED 25.04.2011 SUBMITTED IN LAC 75/2014 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER The co-ordinate bench of this Court on 20.11.2024 had passed a peremptory order, which reads as follows: "Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is granted one week's time to remove office objections failing which the petition shall stand dismissed." - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19814 WP No. 22208 of 2024 2. Even today, office objections are not complied with. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for its non-prosecution. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE JY List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1 CT: BHK