Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3139 (PNJ)

PARGAT SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/46590/2025 · 2026-03-30

Manisha Batra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-46590-2025 -1-                                               Sr. No. Particulars Details 1 The date when the judgment is reserved 25.03.2026 2 The date when the judgment is pronounced 30.03.2026 3 The date when the judgment is uploaded on the website 30.03.2026 4 Whether only operative part of the judgment is pronounced or full judgment is pronounced Full 5 The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full judgment, and reasons thereof Not applicable                                                          !!!       !     "                   #$%    & ' () )    *+*% ,    -&(./ '       )                 01 (  22   3* +4 *+*%       %+*%*53*+6&3#$ 3#2 17    )  0  8  *   "     019           '     :              33 +4 *+*%     9     ;9      9           9  33++46<  9   PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.03.30 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-46590-2025 -2-            9  )   =      >                                 ? 9  &          '      '        " '                        '       9        9   9    ' 9                                                 =         6 6 9& 9                    ) 9   '     9    %        &      6            ')                          ?  @                       "   ;9              #         01       9      "   &     A&    9 9   '        9           3% +4 *+*%  9   B                                        ?    )               9       " )          =                    PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.03.30 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-46590-2025 -3-   " )     9           "          " ) 9       34 +4 *+*%  "                                  )             ' C      A C  A            9  9        "    '                   9        ?  '    9       1   9      5   1 '                '                       6    &       A &   9                  B 9     01 "   9   9  >  B 9   9  )          ' +$   ** 9       >   (               (      9        '         '  '   B                      *3    7   1  "          >     = '        >      1             9  4              )     9   '                   >     "           PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.03.30 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-46590-2025 -4-        >        Therefore, it is stressed that the petition does not deserve to be allowed. <   "  7                     $   "                        9   '9   6                ' '     '9   6                         ;9      '               B   ) 99          "           "           6           '  '                       9            '    9   ' "          "       ) 9     9     3#2 17 "      9         9     ) 9       ) '              B            9       @             9  9   7            9  '          %+* 17 "              '               '   19         9       '        PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.03.30 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-46590-2025 -5-                         ' >                  "          '9       6   "        33  **    9     >  +<          ' +# 9        >           9    '    '      Frivolity of prosecution should always be considered,     '                         :     9               ?      9       '                 7                      9     '    2   1 9                       >                            3+               '             '               "  #           $%&'()&!                        PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.03.30 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document