IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 473 of 2025 Rajesh Yadav, aged about 26 years, son of Dilip Yadav, resident of Village Tarwan, P.O and P.S. Jainagar, District Koderma (Jharkhand) --- --- Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand --- --- Opp. Party With B.A No. 481 of 2025 1. Dilip Yadav, aged about 65 years, son of Rameshwar Yadav 2. Jaswa Devi @ Yashoda Devi, aged about 57 years, wife of Dilip Yadav, both are the residents of village Tarwan, P.O and P.S. Jainagar, District Koderma (Jharkhand) --- --- Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand --- --- Opp. Party --- CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ambuj Nath --- For the Petitioners: Mr. Sahil & Mr. Sourabh Narayan, Advocates For the O.P-State: Mr. Sanjay Kr. Srivastava, A.P.P [B.A. 473/2025] Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, A.P.P. [B.A. 481/2025] For the Informant: Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate --- 03 / 04.03.2025 Both these bail applications arise out of the same police case. Accordingly, they are being disposed of by a common order. Heard the parties. 2. Petitioners have been made accused in connection with Jainagar P.S. Case No. 161 of 2024 for the offences registered under sections 103(1), 238/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M., Koderma. 3. Petitioner Rajesh Yadav is the brother-in-law of the deceased, while petitioners Dilip Yadav and Jaswa Devi are the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the deceased. The deceased who is the daughter of the Informant, was married to Upendra Yadav 18 years prior to the occurrence. On 26.08.2024, she died due to asphyxia because of drowning. 4. Statement of the daughter of deceased was recorded in the case diary in which she has stated that on the date of occurrence, her grandmother and aunt were quarreling, due to which, deceased became agitated and she caught hold of this witness and her brother and was going towards well. However, they managed to escape and the deceased jumped into the well and committed suicide. 2. 5. Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Informant, has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail 6. Considering the statement of the daughter of the deceased, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Koderma in connection with Jainagar P.S. Case No. 161 of 2024. (Ambuj Nath, J) Ranjeet/ Uploaded