Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31384 (ALL)

YATENDRA CHAUDHARY v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/9430/2025 · 2025-03-20

Deepak Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:41581 Court No. - 67 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9430 of 2025 Applicant :- Yatendra Chaudhary Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today on behalf of the applicant, is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant Yatendra Chaudhary with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No.349 of 2019, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 120- B, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Sector-58 Noida, District Gautam Budh Nagar during pendency of the trial. 4. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. In Para-6 of the supplementary affidavit, the applicant has stated that the applicant never served as Director of the Company nor he was ever worked on the muster roll of the Company. Applicant is investor of the scheme of the Company. Learned counsel for the applicant next submitted that co-accused Subham Chaudhary alias Subham Chhillar has been granted bail by this Court by order dated 19.03.2025. Learned counsel for the applicant next submits that the applicant having better case for getting bail on account of parity. There is no prospect of trial of the present case being concluded in near future due to heavy dockets. The applicant is not a previous convict. The applicant is languishing in jail since 09.12.2024 and in case he is enlarged on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 5. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant. 6. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant, Yatendra Chaudhary, who is involved in the aforesaid case crime, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. i. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. 8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Order Date :- 21.3.2025 SKD Digitally signed by :- SURJIT KUMAR DEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad