Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31382 (CHH)

JOHN JOSEPH AGUILAR I I v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2953/2020 · 2025-04-22

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:18227 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2953 of 2020 1 - John Joseph Aguilar I I S/o Mr. John Joseph Aguilar Aged About 57 Years R/o 279, Chalk Bed Road Granitville, South Carolina, Usa 29828 2 - Manjaree Aguilar W/o John Joseph Aguilar Aged About 56 Years R/o 279, Chalk Bed Road Granitville, South Carolina 29828 3 - Josiah James Aguilar S/o Mr. John Joseph Aguilar Ii Aged About 13 Years R/o 279, Chalk Bed Road Granitville, South Carolina 29828 ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Health And Family Welfare And Family Welfare Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director, Department Of Health And Family Welfare And Family Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Chief Medical And Health Officer Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Behind Dks Hospital, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh Pin 492001, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Dig Cum Senior Superintendent Of Police, Collectorate, Kutchery Chowk, Raipur Chhattisgarh 492001, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - The Director, Ramkrishna Care Hospitals Aurobindo Enclave, Pachpedi Naka, New Dhamtari Road, Nh- 43, Raipur Chhattisgarh 492001 6 - The Director, Hotel Babylon Capital Pvt. Ltd. Besides Oswal Petrol Pump, Telibandha, G.E. Road Raipur Chhattisgarh 492001, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners : Shri Mayank Chandrakar, Advocate. For Respondent No.5 : Ms. Nidhi Tiwari, Advocate holding SMT NIRMALA RAO -2- the brief of Shri B.P. Sharma, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 22.04.2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners pleads no instructions in the matter. 2. Taking into consideration the statement made by counsel for the petitioners, this petition is dismissed. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nimmi