[2025:RJ-JP:1804-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Leave To Appeal No. 664/2024 State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Appellant Versus 1. Ramkaran S/o Hajara, (Resident Of Village Sabalpura Ka Jhopda Police Station Dei, District Bundi Rajasthan ) 2. Ramswaroop S/o Ramkaran, (Resident Of Village Sabalpura Ka Jhopda Police Station Dei, District Bundi Rajasthan ) 3. Jodhraj S/o Ramkaran, (Resident Of Village Sabalpura Ka Jhopda Police Station Dei, District Bundi Rajasthan ) 4. Kamlesh S/o Prabhu, (Resident Of Village Sabalpura Ka Jhopda Police Station Dei, District Bundi Rajasthan ) 5. Rajendra S/o Shonath, (Resident Of Village Sabalpura Ka Jhopda Police Station Dei, District Bundi Rajasthan ) 6. Anar Singh @ Nahar Singh S/o Prakash, (Resident Of Village Sabalpura Ka Jhopda Police Station Dei, District Bundi Rajasthan ) ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, Addl. G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order 13/01/2025 Heard on Criminal Leave To Appeal as well as on the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. From perusal of the judgment of the Court below, it is revealed that there were three witnesses and the Court after dealing with the evidence has come to the conclusion that there [2025:RJ-JP:1804-DB] (2 of 2) [CRLLA-664/2024] were no eye witnesses. Even circumstances do not point towards the guilt of the accused, therefore, accused was acquitted. Considering the above, we do not find any ground for condoning the inordinate delay of 299 days in filing the Criminal Appeal as well as for entertaining the Criminal Leave to Appeal. Consequently, the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is dismissed and Criminal Leave to Appeal is also dismissed. (SHUBHA MEHTA),J (PANKAJ BHANDARI),J AMIT/64