IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P(S) No. 480 of 2025 ----- Amirullah Khan aged about 61 year son of late Ajmer Khan, R/o near Masjid, Turk Bigha, P.O. Turk Bigha, P.S. Nasriganj, Dist.-Rohtas (Bihar) … Petitioner(s). Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2. The Director General of Police, Jharkhand, Ranchi, having office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi. 3. The Inspector General of Police, South Chotanagpur Range, Ranchi Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi. 4. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, (Karmik), Ranchi having office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi. 5. The Superintendent of Police, Lohardaga, P.O., P.S. & District- Lohardaga 6. The Accountant General (Accounts and Entitlement), Jharkhand, Ranchi, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi. … Respondent(s). CORAM :SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : M/s. Binod Singh & Ashok Kr. Singh, Advocates For the State : Mr. Raunak Sahay, A.C. to G.P.-V For the Resp. No. 6 : Mr. Sunil Kumar Agarwal, Advocate …...... 02/04.02.2025: 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is entitled for the 3rd M.A.C.P, which has not been paid to the petitioner, though the similarly situated employees have already been given the benefit of the same. He submits that suffice it would be if respondent no. 3 is directed to take a decision on the claim of the petitioner. 3. Counsel appearing on behalf of the State submits that if the petitioner files a fresh representation annexing all the documents including the documents to suggest that similarly situated employees have been given the same benefit, his case will be considered as per the law and the circulars prevalent. 4. Considering the said submission, I direct the petitioner to file a detailed representation before Inspector General of Police, South Chotanagpur Range, Ranchi, respondent no. 3, annexing all the documents which are in his favor. Once the said petition is filed within four weeks, respondent no. 3 will take an appropriate decision on the representation. If it is necessary to place the case before any Committee, the same will be placed by respondent no. 3. If it is found that petitioner is entitled for the relief, the same should be extended to the petitioner immediately. If the claim of the petitioner or any part thereof is rejected, the reasons thereof should be communicated to the petitioner. The entire process should be concluded within 12 weeks from the date of the receipt of the copy of this order along with the representation of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Rashmi/-