NAVIN MAHILA PRATHMIK UPBHOKTA SAHAKARI BHANDAR MARYADIT v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
WPC/3060/2020 · 2025-06-15
Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31377 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31377 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:24281
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3060 of 2020 • Navin Mahila Prathmik Upbhokta Sahakari Bhandar Maryadit Sindhya Nagar Durg Through Its Chairman Neelu Thakur, W/o Late Hemant Thakur, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Sindhya Nagar Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Food Supplies And Consumer Protection, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralay Atal Nagar, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. The Director Of Food Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection, Block 23rd Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Mantralaya Atal Nagar, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. The Collector (Food) Collectorate Office Durg, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh
4. The Commissioner Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection Department Directorate Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection Block - 2 3rd Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Mantralay Atal Nagar, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
5. Food Controller Durg, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh
... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. B.P. Singh, Advocate For State : Mr. Lav Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 16/06/2025
1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- 10.1 The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records relates with the instant petition. Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI
2 10.2 The Hon’ble may kindly be pleased to quash the advertisement dated 31/10/2020 passed by the office of respondent no. 5 (ANNEXURE P-1). 10.3 The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to pas any other orders/direction that, this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case.
2. At the very outset, Mr. B.P. Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition.
3. No objection from other side.
4. Permission granted.
5. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
Judge vatti