THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER HSPL v. SHEPU AND OTHERS
CMP.M/1997/2024 · 2025-10-14
Sushil Kukreja
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31374 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31374 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Chief Executive Officer Vs. Shepu & Ors.
CMP(M) No. 1997/2024 14.10.2025 Present: Mr. Shubham Singh Guleria, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant. Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 and 5. Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No. 2 to 4/State. Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate, for respondents No. 6(a) to 6(c), 6(e) and 6(f).
CMP(M) No. 1997/2024 Notice issued to respondents No. 6(d) and 6(g) has been received back duly served, however, there is no representation on their behalf, hence, they are proceeded ex parte. No reply to the application is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-applicants/respondents. Heard. In view of the averments made in the application, the same is allowed and delay of 13 days that has occurred in filing the appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of.
RFA No.
/2025 Appeal be registered. Notice. Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar, Advocate, Mr. Ankush Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate, accept service of notice on
...2... behalf of respondents No. 1 & 5, respondents No. 2 to 4 and respondents No. 6(a) to 6(c), 6(e) and 6(f), respectively. Let notice be issued to respondents No. 6(d) and 6(g) returnable within four weeks, on taking steps within three days. List on 13.11.2025. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 14th October, 2025 (raman)