1 2025:CGHC:45141 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6666 of 2025 1 - Basant Choudhary S/o Gorakh Lal Choudhary Aged About 41 Years At Present Posted As Teacher (Lb) At Government Middle School Lukapara, Block Saraipali, District Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate Of Lok Shikshan, Indrawati Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Joint Director Education Division, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Collector-Cum-President District Level Rationalization Committee, (Yuktiyuktkaran Samiti), District Mahasamund (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer And Secretary District Level Rationalization Committee, (Yuktiyuktkaran Samiti), District Mahasamund (C.G.) 6 - Block Education Officer Saraipali, District Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shikhar Sharma, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 08/07/2025 1. This is second round of litigation. In the earlier round of litigation the writ petition filed by the petitioner against his/her transfer order after declaring surplus Teacher under the Teacher Rationalization ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.09.03 19:54:02 +0530 2 Instructions, was disposed of with liberty to move fresh representation, if already not made, and in turn the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee was directed to decide the same within specific time period. Now this petition has been filed after rejection of representation filed by the petitioner. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his/her representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law in an objective manner by passing reasoned order as early as possible. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok