Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31370 (KAR)

SRI RAMESH v. SRI GOPALAKRISHNA

RSA/57/2018 · 2025-03-24

Ashok S Kinagi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:12306 RSA No. 57 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 57 OF 2018 (RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RAMESH, S/O. LATE K JANARDHANA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, RESIDING AT ALAKE MANGALORE, D.K.DISTRICT, PIN - 575 003. 2. SMT JAYASHREE, W/O RAMESH, RESIDING AT ALAKE MANGALORE, D.K.DISTRICT, PIN - 575 003. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. RAVISHANKAR SHASTRY G.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI GOPALAKRISHNA, S/O LATE K. JANARDHANA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, RESIDING AT 'SRI RAKSHA' BATTARABETTU COMPOUND, 8TH CROSS, ALAGUDDE, KODIKAL, MANGALURU, D.K.DISTRICT- 575 006. 2. SMT VANAJAKSHI, W/O LATE K. JANARDHANA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, RESIDING AT 'SRI RAKSHA' Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:12306 RSA No. 57 of 2018 BATTARABETTU COMPOUND, 8TH CROSS, ALAGUDDE, KODIKAL, MANGALURU, D.K.DISTRICT- 575 006. 3. SMT PREMALATHA, D/O LATE K. JANARDHANA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, RESIDING AT 'SRI RAKSHA' BATTARABETTU COMPOUND, 8TH CROSS, ALAGUDDE, KODIKAL, MANGALURU, D.K.DISTRICT- 575 006. …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 20.09.2017 PASSED IN R.A.NO.21/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MANGALURU, D.K.,DISMISSING THE APPEAL FILED AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 29.08.2013 PASSED IN OS.NO.1024/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC.,MANGALORE.D.K., THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants, filed a memo for withdrawal. It is stated that by virtue of subsequent developments after filing of the appeal, the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal and the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn. The appellants and their advocates have affixed their signatures on the memo. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:12306 RSA No. 57 of 2018 2. Memo is placed on record. 3. Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. In view of the same, IA No.1/2018 does not survive for consideration. Accordingly disposed off. SD/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE AMA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21