1 2025:CGHC:38933 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA No. 172 of 2020 1 - Smt. Jyoti Tiwari W/o Neelam Tiwari Aged About 40 Years R/o. Kashyap Colony Near Old Bus Stand, Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt. Aarati Mishra W/o Shailendra Mishra Aged About 37 Years R/o. Mahavir Ward Station Road Bhatapara District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 3 - Smt. Mamta Pandey W/o Shailesh Pandey Aged About 47 Years R/o Lakhanpur District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ... Appellants versus 1 - M/ S. Amber Commodeal Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Director Shri Sajjan Kumar S/o Late Lakhiram Agrawal Aged About 45 Years, R/o. Vidyanagar Bilaspur Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt. Girja Bai W/o Mahesh Anand R/o. Gondpara Bilaspur Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Shiv Kumar S/o Madho Prasad Baheliya R/o. Talapara Bilaspur Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Sukhnandan S/o Lallan @ Krishna Netam R/o. Sarkanda Bilaspur Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.08.06 17:40:17 +0530 2 For Appellants : Mr. Pravin Kumar Tulsyan, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Himanshu Sinha, Advocate. For State/respondent No.5 : Mr. Rajeev Bharat, Govt Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order on Board 06/08/2025 1. Heard on I.A. No.03/2025, application under Order 23, Rule 1 of CPC read with Section 151 of CPC. 2. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that matter has been settled between the parties outside the Court, therefore, appellants does not want to prosecute the instant appeal. 3. The prayed made by the learned counsel for the appellants has not been opposed by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 4. On due consideration and for the reason mentioned in the application which is well supported by the affidavit filed by all the 3 appellants who are LRs of the sole Plaintiff - Late Rameshwar Prasad, the aforesaid application is allowed. The appellants are permitted to withdraw the instant appeal. 5. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Ravi Mandavi