IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 223 Raman Garg State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. filed in the Court, states that FIR No.197 dated 15.08.2025, under Sections 420, stands registered against respondents No.5 and 7, in view of which learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the instant petition further. 2. 26.08.2025 parveen kumar Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Raman Garg Versus f Punjab and Others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Amrindra Pratap Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel while referring to para 5 of short reply filed in the Court, states that FIR No.197 dated 15.08.2025, under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC, Police Station Mandi Gobindgarh, stands registered against respondents No.5 and 7, in view of which learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the instant petition Ordered accordingly. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-2207-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 26.08.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Advocate, Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. Learned State counsel while referring to para 5 of short reply filed in the Court, states that FIR No.197 dated 15.08.2025, under 467, 468 and 471 IPC, Police Station Mandi Gobindgarh, stands registered against respondents No.5 and 7, in view of which learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the instant petition any (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.08.27 09:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.