1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.902 of 2025 Date of decision: 21.07.2025 Surinder Kumar. ...Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. ...Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Mr. Dixit Sahotra, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.1-State. : Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 4. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Petitioner seeks execution of decision rendered in Surinder Kumar vs. State of H.P. & Ors.1. Learned counsel for respondents No.2 to 4 has placed on record office order dated 20.07.2025, whereby the pay of the petitioner has been re-fixed and submits that judgment in question stands complied with. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that financial benefits/arrears in terms of aforesaid order have not been released to the petitioner. 1CWP No.6896 of 2025 decided on 30.04.2025 along with connected matters. 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes 3. Learned counsel for respondents No.2 to 4 submits that financial benefits/arrears in terms of the aforesaid order shall be released to the petitioner within one week from today. 4. In view of documents placed on record and submission made by learned counsel for respondents No.2 to 4, this execution petition is disposed of with hope and trust that financial benefits in terms of the aforesaid order shall be paid to the petitioner within one week, i.e. by 29.07.2025, as submitted by learned counsel for respondents No.2 to 4. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for redressal of his surviving grievance, if any, in accordance with law Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, to also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 21st July, 2025 Judge (Pardeep)