[2025:RJ-JP:39966] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12502/2025 Khushiram S/o Chhotelal, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Jatuwas, Police Station Kotkasim, District Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kishangarh Bas). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bharat Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 26/09/2025 1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Khushiram S/o Chhotelal seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.159/2025 dated 02.06.2025 registered at P.S. Kotkasim District, Kotputli for the offence under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 110, 333, 303 (2), 324(4) and 326(G) of B.N.S. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant, has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investiga- tion against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant-accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. The applicant does not have any criminal an- tecedents. He also submits that the applicant undertakes not [2025:RJ-JP:39966] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-12502/2025] to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time. 3. Learned counsel for applicant-accused submitted that appli- cant-accused is an innocent person and is in custody since long and trial will take its time and from tomorrow, there is Navaratra and Vijayadashmi Festival and for celebrating the said Festivals with family members, the applicant may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present appellant is physically handicapped and the allegation upon him is only for provoking other persons who have partici pated in the incident. He has further submitted that the ac cused is in custody since 01.07.2025 and there is no criminal antecedents against him. He has further submitted that iron rod has been recovered at the incident. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant-accused. 6. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 7. Having considered the submissions advanced on behalf of both parties and upon perusal of the material available on record, the Court finds that the grounds raised in support of the bail application, coupled with other facts such as absence of any apprehension regarding absconding of applicant- accused, tampering with evidence, or influencing witnesses, it is justified to grant of bail. [2025:RJ-JP:39966] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-12502/2025] 8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Khushiram S/o Chhotelal, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused is ordered to be released on bail with condition that applicant would furnish a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence pun ishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicants-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J ANIL SHARMA /79