[2025:JHHC:13849] 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.2295 of 2024 --------- 1. Amin Chandra Gope, aged about 56 years, Son of Late Pitam Gope, Resident of Village-Adardih, P.O.-Ichadih, P.S.-Tirildih, Dist.- Seraikella-Kharsawan, Jharkhand 2. Ajit Kumar Mahto, aged about 54 years, Son of Sri Chaitan Mahto, Resident of Village-Diadih, P.O.-Tamori, P.S.-Ichagarh, Dist.-Seraikella-Kharsawan, Jharkhand . .... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand represented through the Secretary, Agriculture and Sugar Cane, Development Department, Government of Jharkhand at Ranchi, having its office at Project Bhawan, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, Dist.-Ranchi, Jharkhand 2. The Secretary, Agriculture and Sugar Cane, Development Department, Government of Jharkhand at Ranchi, having its office at Project Bhawan, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, Dist.-Ranchi, Jharkhand 3. The Director, Agriculture and Sugar Cane, Development Department, Government of Jharkhand at Ranchi, having its office at Project Bhawan, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, Dist.-Ranchi, Jharkhand 4. The Under Secretary, Directorate of Agriculture, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, having its office at Project Bhawan, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, Dist.-Ranchi, Jharkhand 5. The Deputy Development Commissioner-cum-Chief Executive Officer, Seraikella-Kharsawan, having its office at Collectoriate Building, Seraikella-Kharsawan, P.O. & P.S.-Seraikella-Kharsawan, Dist.-Seraikella-Kharsawan, Jharkhand ....Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Tiwary, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Rakesh Kr. Roy, AC to GA-III --------- 02/Dated:- 08.05.2025 The instant writ application has been preferred for following reliefs: (i) For a direction upon the respondents to release the arrears of the salary of the petitioners with admissible interest in the facts and circumstances of this case. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the instant application may be disposed of by giving [2025:JHHC:13849] 2 liberty to the petitioners to file fresh representation before the respondent no.2 and he is directed to take a final decision in accordance with applicable rules and regulations. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents does not have any objection since no counter-affidavit has been filed. 4. Having regard to the limited submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the instant application is hereby disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioners to file fresh representation along with all supporting documents to be relied by him before the respondent no.2 within a period of one month. If any such representation is received by the respondent no.2, he shall look into the matter and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law and applicable rules and regulations within a further period of 12 weeks. 5. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Rohit/-