1 2025:CGHC:32466-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3585 of 2025 M/s. Ramniwas Agrawal Having Its Office At Shankti Ward, Bhatapara, Baloda-Bazar, District Baloda-Bazar Chhattisgarh Through Its Partner Shri Ramesh Agrawal S/o Shri Ram Niwas Agrawal, Aged About 38 Years, R/o H.N. 68, Shankar Ward, Bhatapara, Baloda-Bazar, District Baloda-Bazar Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. C.G. State Warehousing Corporation Head Office Village Jhanjh, Sector-24 Atal Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh Through Its Managing Director 2. Managing Director C.G. State Warehousing Corporation, Head Office Village Jhanjh, Sector-24 Atal Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh 3. Executive Engineer C.G. State Warehousing Corporation, Head Office Village Jhanjh, Sector-24 Atal Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh ...Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Harsh Wardhan, Advocate. BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.07.15 11:10:46 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 14.07.2025 1. Heard Mr. Harsh Wardhan, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: “10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records in respect of the grievance of the petitioner kept in the possession of the respondents, for its kind perusal. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned order dated 13.06.2024 read with letter dated 02.08.2024 (Annexure P/5) passed by the respondent and declare the same to be non-est and illegal. 10.3 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to adjudicate and declare that the additional liability of 6% GST on the contract executed by the petitioner before 18.07.2022 is not be borne by the petitioner. 10.4 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to adjudicate and direct that the respondent Corporation is obligated to refund the additional GST of 6% paid by the petitioner in respect of the petitioner’s contract entered prior to 18.07.2022, within a stipulated time period. 10.5 That, the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to grant any other relief which the Hon’ble Court deems fit and 3 proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case, including grant cost of the petition to the petitioner.” 3. From office note dated 10.07.2025, it is evident that in the present petition, many defects were pointed out by the Registry, which shows that the petitioner had filed the present petition in a very casual manner and the same has not be cured till date, to which learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with a liberty to file afresh petition. 4. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for subject to depositing a sum of Rs.10,000/- as cost by the petitioner before the Registry of this Court and submit a receipt of the same at the time of filing of the fresh petition, if any, and the amount so deposited, if any, shall be transmitted to the Government Special School for Visually Handicapped Boys and Girsl, Jashpur (C.G.). Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan