Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31339 (CHH)

BISARJAN LAL SHRIWAS v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3561/2025 · 2025-07-10

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:32215 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3561 of 2025 Bisarjan Lal Shriwas S/o Late Sitaram Shriwas Aged About 71 Years Caste- Nai, R/o Village- Bundela, Tahsil- Pamgarh, District- Janjgir-Champa, C.G. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Civil And Revenue District- Raipur, C.G. 2 - The Collector Cum District Election Officer Janjgir, Civil And Revenue District- Janjgir- Champa, C.G. 3 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Rev.) Janjgir, Civil And Revenue District- Janjgir-Champa, C.G. 4 - The Tahsildar Cum Returning Officer (Panchayat) Pamgarh, Civil And Revenue District- Janjgir-Champa, C.G. 5 - The Patwari Halka No. 20, R.N.M. Rathod, Tahsil- Pamgarh, Civil And Revenue District- Janjgir-Champa, C.G. 6 - Smt. Ashwani Devi W/o Shri Resham Lal Suryawanshi Aged About 41 Years R/o Village- Bundela, Tahsil- Pamgarh, Civil And Revenue District- Janjgir-Champa, C.G. 7 - Smt. Sunita Sinha W/o Late Shani Ram Sinha Aged About 38 Years R/o Village- Bundela, Tahsil- Pamgarh, Civil And Revenue District- Janjgir-Champa, C.G. 8 - Ram Gopal Shriwas S/o Shri Jhojhawa Shriwas Aged About 46 Years R/o Village- Bundela, Tahsil- Pamgarh, Civil And Revenue District- Janjgir-Champa, C.G. 9 - Sukal Singh Kanwar S/o Shri Sunau Singh Kanwar Aged About 39 Years R/o Village- Bundela, Tahsil- Pamgarh, Civil And Revenue District- Janjgir-Champa, C.G. 10 - Smt. Mangali Bai W/o Late Chheduram Aged About 56 Years R/o Village- Bundela, Tahsil- Pamgarh, Civil And Revenue District- Janjgir-Champa, C.G. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Paras Mani Shriwas, Advocate For State : Mr. Praveen Das, Deputy Advocate General Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma 2 Order on Board 11.07.2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for sometime, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to file Election Petition. 2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file Election Petition, only if law permits. 3. Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE alfiza