1 2025:CGHC:28962 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6686 of 2025 1 - Suresh Bharti S/o Judawan Bharti Aged About 41 Years Presently Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School, Udhra Block Sarangarh District - Sarangarh - Bilaigarh (C.G.) 2 - Huleshwar Prasad Chandra S/o Lakhan Lal Chandra Aged About 51 Years Presently Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School Khambardih Block Sarangarh District -Sarangarh - Bilaigarh (C.G.) 3 - Smt. Suman Bhagat W/o Krishna Kanhaiya Lal Bhagat Aged About 35 Years Presently Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School Rapagula Block Sarangarh District -Sarangarh - Bilaigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of School Education Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction Indrawati Bhawan Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Joint Director Education Division Bilsapur District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Collector District - Sarangarh - Bilaigarh (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer Sarangarh Bilaigarh District - Sarangarh - Bilaigarh (C.G.) 6 - Block Education Officer Sarangarh District - Sarangarh - Bilaigarh (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Akash Pandey, Advocate. For State-Respondents : Mr. Mayur Khandelwal, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 30-06-2025 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner(s) is/are challenging the impugned transfer order(s) and action of the respondents whereby the petitioner(s) Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 has/have been declared surplus Teacher(s) and consequently transferred under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) would submit that the petitioners have joined at their transferred place. It is further submitted that the list of surplus Teachers published by the respondents is against the rationalization instructions and the same is arbitrary as no proper opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioner(s) and if the petitioner(s) is/are not granted relief, he/she/they will suffer with irreparable loss. Learned counsel for the petitioners would further submit that the petitioners still want to pursue their representation before the concerned authorities to redress their grievances. 3. Learned counsel for the State would submit that after due verification of records the petitioner(s) has/have been transferred under the rationalization instructions issued by the State Government. It is further submitted that if the petitioner(s) is/are having any grievance, he/she/they may move fresh representation before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee and the Committee will take a decision on his/her/their representation(s) in accordance with law within a stipulated period. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and documents. 5. In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioner(s) is/are directed to make fresh representation(s) before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee within a period of five days from today and thereafter the Committee shall decide the same within a further period of five days from the date of receipt of representation(s) in accordance with law in objective manner. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil