APHC010012682025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 668/2025 Between: 1. SHAIK HAZI RAHAMTHULLAH,, S/O. ABDUL RASHEED, AGED ABOUT 49, OCC PROPRIETOR, A.N. AUTOMOBILES, R/O. D.NO. 8- 4-142, GNT ROAD, SULLURPET, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI DISTRICT AT TIRUPATI. 3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NAIDUPET, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 4. INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SULLURPET POLICE STATION, TIRUPATI DISTRICT 5. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SULLURUPET POLICE STATION, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 6. KOTHURU PRAKESH, S/O. SRIRAMULU CHETTY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. UP STAIRS OF BLUE DART COURIERS, PARAMESWARI NAGAR, SULLURPET TOWN AND MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MUCHAKAYALA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “….to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of 4th and 5th respondents at the instance of 6th respondent in insisting me to appear before their authority and yield to the terms of 6th respondent in connected to civil disputes in O.S No. 9 of 2023 pending on the file of the court of Learned Senior Civil Judge, Gudur, Tirupati District and threatening me to implicate my name in false criminal case under Sc and St Atrocities act, without there being any authority of law and declare the same as illegal. arbitrary and unjust and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 4 and 5 not to interfere in any manner with my life and liberty and pass…. 2. Heard Sri M.Narayana, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the police are interfering in the civil dispute between the petitioner and 6th respondent. Learned counsel would further submit that Suit in O.S.No.09 of 2023 is pending on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Gudur. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Considering the submissions made, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil matter that to when the civil suit is pending before the Court. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 10.01.2025 MH 143 HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.668 of 2025 Dt.10.01.2025 MH