Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31324 (JHR)

SUDIPTA SADHU v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/2019/2025 · 2025-05-01

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:13081 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P (S) No. 2019 of 2025 ---- Sudipta Sadhu, aged about 36 years, son of Sagar Sadhu, resident of Ramganja, Panchsowa, Birbhum, P.O. & P.S. Birbhum, District Birbhum, West Bengal. ..........Petitioner Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2. Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, having its office at H.E.C., P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 3. The Principal Secretary, Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha Department, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at H.E.C., P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 4. Director, Directorate of Secondary Education, having its office at H.E.C., P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 5. Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, represented through its Secretary, having his office at Kalinagar, Chaay Bagan, P.O. & P.S. Namkum, Ranchi, Jharkhand-834010. 6. The Examination Controller, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, having his office at Kalinagar, Chaay Bagan, P.O. & P.S. Namkum, Ranchi, Jharkhand-834010. .........Respondents ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rohan Kashyap, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Ranjan Kumar, AC to Sr.SC-I M/s. Sanjoy Piprawall, Rakesh Ranjan, Prince Kumar, Jay Prakash, Advocates ---- 02/01.05.2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submits that the issue involved in this writ application has already been decided against the petitioner in L.P.A. No. 143 of 2024 (Nirmal Pahan & Ors. Vs. the State of Jharkhand & Ors.) and other analogous cases, decided on 28.02.2025. 2. In view of the aforesaid facts and looking to the prayer made in this writ application and also the order passed in L.P.A. No. 143 of 2024 and other analogous cases, no relief can be granted to this petitioner. 3. Accordingly, the instant writ application is hereby dismissed. 4. No order as to cost. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Kunal