Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31316 (RAJ)

CHHITAR SINGH SHEKHAWAT S/O NARAYAN SINGH SHEKHAWAT v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/15911/2024 · 2025-02-06

Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, Uma Shanker Vyas

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:5313-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ (PIL) Petition No. 15911/2024 1. Chhitar Singh Shekhawat S/o Narayan Singh Shekhawat, Aged About 51 Years, Resident Of Village Of Chota Gudha, Post Gudliya Via Badhal District Jaipur Rajasthan, Presently Resident Of Khatu Shyam Ji, District Sikar, Rajasthan. 2. Banwari Lal Bunkar S/o Suraj Mal Bunkar, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Village Of Chota Gudha, Post Gudliya Via Badhal District Jaipur Rajasthan, Presently Resident Of Khatu Shyam Ji, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Chief Secretary, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The District Collector, Office Of District Collector, Sikar Rajasthan. 3. The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Office Of Sub Divisional Magistrate, Dantaramgarh, District Sikar Rajasthan. 4. The Tehsildar, Office Of Tehsildar, Dantaramgarh, District Sikar Rajasthan. 5. Nagar Palika Khatu Shyam Ji, District Sikar Through Its Executive Officer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yunus Khan For Respondent(s) : Ms. Shikha Sharma & Ms. Kritika Sahu on behalf of Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order 06/02/2025 1. Heard. [2025:RJ-JP:5313-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-15911/2024] 2. This PIL petition has been filed without impleading the person whose allotment is under challenge. Even the order of allotment is not on record. 3. The PIL petition, being misconceived, is dismissed with liberty to file proper petition. (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ SANJAY KUMAWAT/RAJAT/17