[2025:RJ-JP:34695] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16812/2024 1. Shri Bhagwan Sahu S/o Shri Kani Ram Sahu, Aged About 61 Years, Residents Of 11, L.n.p., Khyalivala, District Sriganganagar (Raj.)- 335001. 2. Shri Sajjan Kumar S/o Shri Kani Ram Sahu, Aged About 63 Years, Residents Of 11, L.n.p., Khyalivala, District Sriganganagar (Raj.)- 335001. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Axis Bank Limited, Through Its Authorized Representative, No. 4 B/22, Adjacent To Gupta Nursing Home, Sriganganagar, (Rajasthan)-335001 2. M/s Choudhary Brothers, Through Its Proprietor, Mrs. Nirmala Devi W/o Sh. Om Prakash, 151, New Grain Market Sriganganagar-335001, Also At 107, New Dhan Mandi Hanumangarh Town, Rajasthan- 335513 And Also At Shop No. 24 A, New Dhan Mandi, Hanumangarh (Raj.) 3. Mrs. Nirmala Devi W/o Mr. Om Prakash, W.no. 5, Sadulsahar, District Sriganganagar, Rajasthan. 4. Mr. Om Prakash S/o Shri Gopi Ram, W.no. 5, Sadulsahar, District Sriganganagar, Rajasthan. 5. Mr. Amandeep Tarar S/o Shri Om Prakash, W.no. 5, Sadulsahar, District Sriganganagar, Rajasthan. 6. Union Of India, Through- Secretary Ministry Of Finance, Department Of Financial Services, New Delhi. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Naresh Vijay Mr. Priyank Sanwariya Ms. Shruti Sharma For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 29/08/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:34695] (2 of 2) [CW-16812/2024] 1. By way of filing this writ petition, a prayer has been made for issuing a direction to the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Delhi (for short, ‘the DRAT’) to decide the appeal submitted by the petitioners against the order passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur. 2. Counsel for the petitioners submits that an appeal preferred by the petitioners is pending before the DRAT since 2023 but inspite of passing of considerable time, till date, the appeal has not been decided, therefore appropriate direction be issued to the DRAT to decide the appeal expeditiously within a time frame. 3. Considering the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioners and looking to the fact that the appeal is lying pending before the DRAT since last two years, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the writ petition with expectations from the DRAT to make all possible endeavours to decide the pending appeal expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to all the respective parties. 4. 4. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/52