G K D NARAYANA YADAV v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP(AT)/1533/2021 · 2025-03-24
B S Bhanumathi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31314 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31314 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010452682021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) Monday, the twenty f two The Honourable Ms Justice B S Bhanumathi W. Between: G K D Narayana Yadav The State of Andhra Pradesh and others Counsel for the petitioner:
1. M Ratna Reddy Counsel for the Respondents
1.
GP for Services III The Court made the following
O R D E R: This writ petition is filed declare the action of the respondents in not continuing the applicant in the Collegiate Education inspite of his option dated 19 to the post of Superintendent as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Article 14 16 of the Constitution of India and also call for the records relating to proceedings Rc.No.481/O.P.I/2017 respondent and proceedings Rc.No.482/B1/2018 the 2nd respondent and set aside the same as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Monday, the twenty fourth day of March wo thousand and twenty five PRESENT The Honourable Ms Justice B S Bhanumathi W.P(AT) No: 1533 of 2021 O.A.No.289 of 2018
...Petitioner and The State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondents Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to declare the action of the respondents in not continuing the applicant in the Collegiate Education inspite of his option dated 19-5-2005 and not promoting Superintendent as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Article 14 16 of the Constitution of India and also call for the records relating to proceedings Rc.No.481/O.P.I/2017-1 dated 16-5-2018 issued by the 4 roceedings Rc.No.482/B1/2018 dated 25-6-2018 issued by respondent and set aside the same as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3311] ...Petitioner ...Respondents under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to declare the action of the respondents in not continuing the applicant in the 2005 and not promoting Superintendent as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and also call for the records relating to 2018 issued by the 4th 2018 issued by respondent and set aside the same as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to
2 W.P.(AT) No.1533 of 2021 Rules and consequently direct the respondents to continue the applicant in the Collegiate Education and to consider the case of the applicant for promotion to the post of Superintendent in Zone-IV in Collegiate Education and promote him as such with all consequential benefits.
2. As the learned counsel for the petitioner reportedly died, this Court, on 19.02.2024, directed issue of notice to the petitioner. As per the office note, the notice had been served on the petitioner and no vakalat had been filed. 3. For want of appearance and prosecution, the petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________ ___ JUSTICE B.S. BHANUMATHI Dated 24.03.2025 PNV