[2025:RJ-JP:4421-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 614/2024 1. Shri Radheshyam Dangayach Son Of Late Shri Gyarsi Lal Dangayach, Aged About 87 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 1, Khandela House, Behind Amber Tower, Sansar Chandra Road, Jaipur. 2. Smt. Rameshwari Dangayach W/o Shri Radheshyam Dangayach, Aged About 82 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 1, Khandela House, Behind Amber Tower, Sansar Chandra Road, Jaipur. ----Appellants Versus 1. Rajeev Dangayach S/o Shri Radheshyam Dangayach, Aged About 61 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 1, Khandela House, Behind Amber Tower, Sansar Chandra Road, Jaipur At Present Residing At Plot No. 30, Ganga Path, Suraj Nagar West, Civil Lines, Jaipur. 2. Anita W/o Shri Rajeev Dangayach, Aged About 58 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 1, Khandela House, Behind Amber Tower, Sansar Chandra Road, Jaipur At Present Residing At Plot No. 30, Ganga Path, Suraj Nagar West, Civil Lines, Jaipur. 3. Sagar Dangayach S/o Shri Rajeev Dangayach, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 1, Khandela House, Behind Amber Tower, Sansar Chandra Road, Jaipur At Present Residing At Plot No. 30, Ganga Path, Suraj Nagar West, Civil Lines, Jaipur. 4. Sanjay Gupta S/o Sh. Radheshyam Dangayach, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 1, Khandela House, Behind Amber Tower, Sansar Chandra Road, Jaipur. Presently Residing Plot No. 80/421 Mansarovar Jaipur. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Anoop Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anurag Shukla HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 31/01/2025 Heard on the application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. [2025:RJ-JP:4421-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-614/2024] For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. This appeal has been filed by the appellants against the interim order dated 16.07.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge. We have perused the record including the order dated 16.07.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge. Both the petitioners are old aged persons, above the age of 80 years. We find that the order passed by the learned Single Judge, impugned herein, is an interim order and the main writ petition is still pending for consideration. In view of the facts before us, we consider it appropriate to grant liberty to the appellants to file application for early disposal of the writ petition, at the same time it is expected that the writ petition may be decided expeditiously. With the above observations, the appeal stands disposed of. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Arun Bathla /25