IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (226) FAO-2469-2000 Date of decision: - 21.04.2025 Suresh Kumar ....Appellant Versus Mithu Lal and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present:- Mr. Ravi Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Sanjay Mittal, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Maninder Jit Singh, Advocate for Mr. Amit Jaiswal, Advocate, for respondent No.3. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that in spite of his best efforts, he has not been able to get in touch with the appellant and even no one has approached his office so as to state as to whether any cause survives in the present appeal or not. It is prayed that the present appeal be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous but liberty be granted to the appellant to revive the appeal in case any cause survives. 2. In view of the above, the present appeal is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 3. Liberty is granted to the appellant to move an application for restoration of the appeal in case any cause survives. ( VIKAS BAHL ) April 21, 2025 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No NARESH KUMAR 2025.04.23 11:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement