IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.11314 of 2025 Date of decision: 16.07.2025 Piar Chand. ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ...Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. R.L. Verma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 4-State. : Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.5. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition lacks material particulars and requires thorough amendment, not only in the factual averments and grounds but also in the relief clause. Learned counsel, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh after incorporating proper pleadings. 2. Prayer is accepted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 16th July, 2025 Judge (Pardeep) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes