G SRINIVASULU CHETTY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/2394/2025 · 2025-01-31
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3131 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3131 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010012282025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] FRIDAY ,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 2394/2025 Between:
1. G SRINIVASULU CHETTY, S/O SUBBERAMAIAH CHETTY, OCC AGRICULTURE, AGE 60 YEARS, D.NO.11-1-325, GANDHI ROAD CHITTOOR (URBAN),ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH - 522 508
2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL, (REGISTRATION AND STAMPS), D.NO.5-59, R.K.SPRING VALLEY APARTMENTS, EDUPUGALLU, KANKIPADU, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 521151.
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT (FORMERLY CHITTOOR DISTRICT).
4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATI DIVISION, TIRUPATI DISTRICT (FORMERLY CHITTOOR DISTRICT)
5. THE JOINT SUB REGISTRAR, TIRUPATI URBAN FORMERLY CHITTOOR DISTRICT, TIRUPATI DISTRICT.
6. THE TAHSILDAR, M.R.O.OFFICE, TIRUPATI URBAN MANDAL (FORMERLY CHITTOOR DISTRICT) TIRUPATI DISTRICT.
2
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. CH VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER:
Heard Sri T.Harsha Sai Pavan, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Ch. Venkat Raman, Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri K. Arjun Chowdhary, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the Respondents.
2.
Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to the Application submitted through Mee-Seva dated 28.06.2023. The Writ Petitioner has also submitted a Representation through the Public Grievance Redressal System on 02.09.2024.
3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of this Writ Petition, at the admission stage, without going into the merit, with a direction to the District Collector, Tirupati District (Respondent No.3) to consider the Application of the Writ Petitioner seeking modification in the Prohibited Properties List under Section 22A of the Registration Act, by passing a Speaking Order in accordance with law within a period of 14 weeks from today and communicate a copy of such Order to the Writ Petitioner forthwith.
4. Writ Petitioner is directed to submit a copy of the Mee Seva application and the representation (referred supra) along with any other material documents that he desires to rely upon, to the District Collector (Respondent No.3) along with a copy of this Order within one week from today, for effective compliance.
3
5. Needless to state that the Respondent No.3 is statutorily obligated to adhere to the principles of Natural Justice by issuing advance Notice to all the interested parties including the Writ Petitioner, consider their
submissions/objections and documents, if any, before passing the final order.
6. With these observations and directions, this Writ Petition stands
disposed of. No order as to costs.
7. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
_________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 31.01.2025 UPS
4
07
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION No:2394 of 2025
31.01.2025
UPS