IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL P RADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.1071 of 2025 Date of Decision: 16.10.2025 ___________________________________________________________ Kulwant Kumar ……...Petitioner Versus Dr. Nipun Jindal and Another …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? ____________________________________________________________ For the Petitioner: Mr. Sohail Khan, Advocate, vice Mr. H.R. Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate. ____________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) While placing on record order dated 14.10.2025, issued under the signatures of Managing Director, HRTC, Shimla, Mr. Deepak Sharma, while putting in appearance on behalf of respondents, states that mandate contained in the judgment, alleged to have been violated, stands complied with. 2. Having carefully perused office order dated 14.10.2025, which is taken on record, vis-a-vis directions contained in the judgment, alleged to have been violated, there appears to be merit in the contention of learned counsel representing the respondents. 3. Since there was only direction to consider and decide the case of the petitioner in light of judgment rendered by this Court in CWP No.2110 of 2019, titled as Rajinder Kumar Vs. HRTC and Anr., decided on 2 22.10.2019 and respondents, after having considered the case of the petitioner in light of aforesaid judgment, have rejected the case of the petitioner, no action of respondents can be said to be contumacious. 4. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly the same are closed, however, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in the appropriate Court of law, qua the surviving grievance, if any. October 16, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (Rajeev Raturi) Judge