Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31309 (ALL)

HET SINGH ALIAS HETA v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/9084/2025 · 2025-03-20

Sanjay Kumar Pachori

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:41947 Court No. - 72 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 9084 of 2025 Applicant :- Het Singh Alias Heta Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar,Kalp Dev Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J. Sri Anil Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State are present. The present application under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. has been filed to quash the order dated 6.11.2023 passed by Special Judge (Dacoity Affected Area)/ Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 3, Agra in S.S.T. No. 770 of 2019, arising out of Case Crime No. 300 of 2019, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 of I.P.C. and Section 15 of D.A.A. Act, P.S. Fatehabad, District Agra, whereby non bailable warrant has been issued against the applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant was on bail prior to issuing non bailable warrant. It is further submitted that the impugned order has been passed by the court without satisfying itself that the summon and other process for attendance has been served and without issuing any summon or bailable warrant, direct N.B.W. has been issued. Learned counsel for the applicant further submitted that the impugned order has been passed without considering the facts and circumstances of the case and law provided in this regard. It is further submitted that order of the non-bailable warrant has been passed without satisfying the service of summons or bailable warrants itself and reason to believe from absconding the process of the court. Learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 have opposed the application. Considering submissions of learned counsel and perusing record, the instant application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is finally disposed of with a direction that in case applicant appears before the court below within three weeks from today and applies for bail/recall of non bailable warrant, his application shall be decided in the light of the observations made in the judgments rendered by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773, Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Another 2022 (11) SCC 676 and Aman Preet Singh Vs. C.B.I. through Director 2021 SCC Online SC 941. For a period of three weeks from today or till applicant appears before the court below, whichever is earlier, execution of non bailable warrant against the applicant shall be kept in abeyance. Order Date :- 21.3.2025 A.P. Pandey Digitally signed by :- ANAND PRAKASH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad