BHERURAM GURJAR SON OF SHRI REVAD RAM GURJAR v. PRAKASH RAJPUROHIT
CCP/1033/2022 · 2025-01-03
Inderjeet Singh, Vinod Kumar Bharwani
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31306 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 31306 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:257-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1033/2022 in D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.6873/2021 Bheruram Gurjar Son Of Shri Revad Ram Gurjar, Village Ghata Jaldhari, Post Basna, Tehsil Jamba Ramgarh District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Prakash Rajpurohit, District Collector, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Revenue Department, Government Secretariat Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3. Govind Ram S/o Badri Narayan, Aged About 55 Years, Presently Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Basna, R/o Ghata Jaldhari, Post Basna, Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur, ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Indrajeet Chaudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG assisted by Mr. Manoj Choudhary Mr. Rahul Kamwar Ms. Aradhana Swami Ms. Vandana Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 03/01/2025 The present contempt petition has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner for non-compliance of the order dated 15.11.2021 passed by this Court in D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.6873/2021 wherein while disposing of the writ petition, this Court directed the Collector, Jaipur to look into the complaint made by the petitioner and take final decision accordingly. In
[2025:RJ-JP:257-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-1033/2022] compliance thereto, the respondent(s) issued notice to the encroachers. The said notice was challenged by the encroachers before this Court by filing S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4513/2024 (Lala Ram v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) wherein learned Single Judge stayed the dispossession of the affected persons vide order dated 22.03.2024. We have gone through the order dated 22.03.2024 passed by learned Single Judge wherein learned Single Judge has also considered the order dated 10.01.2024 passed by this Court. In that view of the matter, we find that there is no disobedience of the order passed by this Court on the part of the respondent-contemnors and thus, we are not inclined to entertain the present contempt petition. Accordingly, the present contempt petition is dismissed.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J SAHIL SONI /25