Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31301 (AP)

B.Jyothi, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/28763/2016 · 2025-08-18

V Sujatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010454402016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 28763/2016 Between: 1. B.JYOTHI,, W/O B.SRINIVASULU, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCC: SARPANCH, THEERTHAM VILLAGE & PANCHAYATH, BAIREDDYPALLI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR CHITTOOR DISTRICT CHITTOOR, - 3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BIREDDYPALLI MANDAL, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 7. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BASIREDDYPALLI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 8. S KRISHNA MURHTY, S/O. RANGA RAI MODILAR, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC:EX.SURPANCH, R/O. THEERTHAM VILLAGE, 2 BAIREDDYPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.7 in entrusting the 'Neeru Cheetu' de-silting work of Bommidayakunta Tank, Baireddypalli Mandal, Chittoor District in favor of respondent No.8 as highly illegal, colorable exercise of power, quite contrary to the provisions of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005, the Andhra Pradesh Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme and also the Guidelines framed through G.O.Ms.No.70, dated 14-12-2014 and the subsequent G.Os and Memos being issued by the respondent No. I and violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to petitioner under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the entrustment of Neeru Chettu desilting Work of Bommidayakunta Tank, Baireddypalli Mandal, Chittoor District in favor of the respondent No.8 IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 35604 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay execution of Neeru Chettu desilting Work of Bommidayakunta Tank, Baireddypalli Mandal, Chittoor District by the respondent No.8, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S PARINEETA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 7432/K RAMAMOHAN 2. 15548/GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3. GP FOR IRRI AND CAD (AP) The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Today when the matter came up for hearing, Sri. S.V. Durga Prasad, learned counsel representing M/s S. Parineeta, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the cause in the present writ petition would not survive for further adjudication and that no further orders are necessary in the present petition. In view of the above submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V. SUJATHA Date: 19.08.2025 GSS