Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31300 (RAJ)

GOUTAM MEGHWAL AND ORS v. C M D R R V P N LTD ORS

CW/19864/2012 · 2025-02-20

Anoop Kumar Dhand

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:7762] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19864/2012 1.Goutam Meghwal S/o Mangilal Meghwal Aged about 34 years Gali No.10 Khanpura Road Subhash Nagar Ajmer 305001 2. Kishan Gopal Modi S/o Mahavir Prasad Modi, Behind Panchayat Samiti, Village and Post Talida District Bundi 323021. 3. Dharmendra Maurya S/o Brij Mohan Maurya Aged 36 years, Lal Darwaja (lal basti) Biana District Bharatpur 321401 4. Shankerlal S/o Heeralal aged about 40 years Village Sudarpur via Kachola Post Bhagunagar District Bhilwara 31165 5. Riyaz Ahmed Mansuri S/o Rafiq ahmed Munsuri aged 37 years mat chowk mohalla Aklera District Jhalawar 326033. 6. Sultan Singh S/o Shri Bhola Singh aged 40 years 132 KVGSS RVPNL Moda Srikaranpur District Ganganagar. 7. Laxmi Narain Rathore S/o Jaganath Rathore aged 37 years House No. d60 opp. Teliyo ka Mandir Ramchandrapura, Kota. 8. Mohammed Sazid S/o Imdad Hussain aged 33 years Excellent Tailor opp. Mohan Talkies J.P. Market shop No. 79 Kota. 9. Sunderlal Verma S/o Mool Chand Verma AEN 132 KVGSS RVPNL KOTA road baran. 10. Ramkishan sen S/o Badrilal sen aged 39 years C/o Jagdish Sen Cycle store, post Golna Tehsil Khanpur Jhalawar. 11. Chandra Shekhar Malav S/o Ghhansilal Malav aged 32 years near Khandelwal Dharamshala anta District Baran 325202. 12. Lalit Kishore Gochar S/o Gopilal Sochar Aged 40 years Kota Road Railway Station Lakheri District Bundi. 13. Hajarilal S/o Phool Singh aged 32 years Behind Sinkalebar Colony near Railway Gate No. 38 Bharatpur. 14. Pradepp Kumar Tailor S/o Gajanand Tailor aged 40 years R/o Ranoli Tehsil Ranoli District Sikar. 15. Raj Kumar S/o Chiranju Lal C/o AEN (132) KV GSS RVPN Bagar, Jhunjhunu ----Petitioners Versus 1. Chairmanb & Managing Director, Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigan Ltd. (A government of Rajasthan undertaking) Vidyut Bhawan Janpath Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur. 2. The Secretary (Adm) RVPN, Jaipur, Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd. Jaipur. 3. The Dy. Director Personnel, (HQ) T&C (civil) RVPN, Jaipur. [2025:RJ-JP:7762] (2 of 5) [CW-19864/2012] 4. Superintending Engineer (TCC-1) RVPN, Heerapura Jaipur. Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18373/2012 1. Rajesh Kumar Yogi S/o Shri Hari Ram Yogi, Present Working At 132, Kvgss, Sirsi Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Rajendra Singh S/o Sajjan Singh, 132, Kvgss Pipar Shahar Jaspali Road, District Jodhpur. 3. Jamnalal Shahu S/o Madanlal Sahu, H.no.17, Sindhi Sarkar Haveli Kheradiwada Udaipur, Saher District Udaipur. 4. Amar Singh S/o Puran Singh, 132 Kv Gss, Rvpnl Amet Salmpura Post Ghosunda, District Rajsamand. 5. Kesa Am Luhar S/o Mangilal, Vandp Ranidehsipura Tehsil Siwana District Barmer. 6. Manish Puri Goswami S/o Puroshottam Puri, H.no. A21, Sector 5, Gansdhinagar, Chittorgarh. 7. Prem Chand Teli S/o Mohanlal Teli, Behind State Bank, Vandp Dungla District Chittorgarh. 8. Hanumandas Vaishnav S/o Kishore Das, C/o 132 Kv Gss, Rvpn, Borunda District Jodhpur. 9. Shankar Lal Moolwal S/o Shribana Ram, Post Guda Khurd Via Palsana, District Sikar. 10. Manoj Kumar S/o Gjsida [2025:RJ-JP:7762] (3 of 5) [CW-19864/2012] Ram, Office Of Aen 132 Kv Gss Laxmangarh, Sikar. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Chairman And Managing Director, Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd. A Government Of Rajasth, Vidyut Bhawan Janpath, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur. 2. The Secretary Adm. Rvpn, Jaipur Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd., Jaipur. 3. The Dy. Director Personnel Hq Tandc Civil Rvpn, Jaipur. 4. Superintending Engineer Tcc- 1 Rvpn, Heerapura, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 20/02/2025 1. Since, common question of law and facts are involved in both these writ petitions, hence, with the consent of counsel for the parties, these petitions are taken up together for final disposal and are being decided by this common order. 2. For conveyance the facts mentioned in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19864/2012 have been taken into consideration the instant petition has been preferred with the following prayer: “A. by an appropriate writ order or directions in the nature thereof, the seniority [2025:RJ-JP:7762] (4 of 5) [CW-19864/2012] list dated 01.11.2012 may kindly be quashed and set aside. B. By an appropriate writ order or directions in the nature thereof, the respondents may be directed to decide the appeal filed by the petitioners in accordance with the provisions of law and in the view of laid by the Hon’ble Apex Court in number of cases. C. Any other order or directions which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case may also kindly be issued in favour of petitioners. D. Cost of petition may kindly be awarded in favour of the petitioners. “ 3. Prayer Clause-b of the petition indicates that an appeal filed is pending before the respondent-authorities hence, prayer has been made for issuing the directions to the respondent to decide the same in accordance with law. 4. Considering the aforesaid prayer mentioned in the Clause-B, the instant writ petition is disposed of by issuing order/directions to the respondents to decide appeal the pending, if any, expeditiously as early as possible preferrably within a period of three months from the date of certified copy of this order by passing a reasoned and speaking order, after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and all respective parties. 5. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any order/directions to the respondents to decide the appeal in the particular manner, and the Appellate Authority would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. 6. Since, parties are not present before this Court and they are not aware about of this order. Office is directed to send a copy of [2025:RJ-JP:7762] (5 of 5) [CW-19864/2012] this order to the petitioner as well as the respondents on their respective addresses mentioned in the memo of cause title. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J NEERU /79-80