IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVAT (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 776 OF 2025 Between: A. Venkata Ramana, S/o Late. A. Dhanunjayudu, Age about 45 years, R/o D.N0.81-5-A1, Raghavendra Nagar, Kurnool, Kurnool District ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. 2. The Commissioner and Director of School Education, Atmakur Village, Mangalagiri Mandal, Guntur District. 3. The District Educational Officer, Kurnool District. 4. The Mandal Educational officer, Kurnool Mandal, Kurnool District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226"of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue any writ or order or direction more particularly one in may the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents i; . not considering the petitioners case as language pandit (Telugu) and granting of notional seniority and monetary benefits benefits as illegal, arbitrary and consequently- direct the respondents to consider case of the petitioner to the post of language pandit (Telugu) by granting notional seniority and monetary benefits in the interest of justice. ^ in \ lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider my representation dated: 17- 11-2024 pending the writ petition in this Hon'ble Court. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAJA REDDY KONETI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR SERVICES Hf The Court made the following: ORDER 1 APHC010012522025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3310] FRIDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 776/2025 Between; A Venkata Ramana ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.RAJA REDDY KONETI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR SERVICES III The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “ declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the petitioner’s case as language pandit (Telugu) and granting of notional seniority and monetary benefits as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to consider case of the petitioner to the post of language pandit (Teiugu) by granting notional seniority and monetary benefits in the interest ofJustice and pass such other order or orders ” 2. Heard learned Government Pleader for Services-lll, 3. On hearing, learned counsel for the which are urged in the writ petition and limited his representation dated 07,11.2024 submitted by the the merits of the counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant appearing for the respondents 1 to 4. petitioner reiterated the contentions request to dispose of the petitioner, without touching case. 4. On the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services- IM, appearing for the respondents 1 to 4, readily agreed to dispose of the said representation submitted by the petitioner, if it is pending with the respondent- authorities. 5. In view of the submission of the learned this Court need not decide the truth petition. This Court is conscious that no such direction be issued, in view of the Judgment of the Honourable Apex Court in T/te Go.ernn,ent ofMa v. Apex Court held that such orders Assistant Government Pleader, or otherwise of the allegations made in the P.Venkatesh^”, wherein the Honourable may make for a quick or easy disposal of institutions. But, they do other alternative except to issue such direction. cases in overburdened adjudicatory no service to the cause of justice. Hence I find no 6. In the result, the Writ Petition i respondents to dispose of the IS disposed of, directing representation dated 07.11.2024 submitted by the 2019 (8) SCALE 544 3 the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three (03) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand 7. closed. Sd/- Wl.RAWlESH BABU deputy registrar //TRUE COPY// ' SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, School Education Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. 2. The Commissioner and Director of School Education, Atmakur Villag^, Mangalagiri Mandal, Guntur District. 3. The District Educational Officer, Kurnool District. ^ 4 The Mandal Educational officer, Kurnool Mandal, Kurnool District. 5. One CC to Sri Raja Reddy Koneti, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Services-lll, High Court of Andhra 7. Three CD Copies. PradeslC [OUT] ssb HIGH COURT DATED:10/01/2025 ORDER WP.No.776 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS