SARTAJ AHMAD BHAT v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOME)
HCP/19/2025 · 2026-03-02
Rahul Bharti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 313 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 313 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
HCP 19/2025.
Sartaj Ahmad Bhat.
…Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Waseem Shamas, Advocate.
VERSUS
Union Territory Of J And K And Ors.
…Respondent(s)
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE.
ORDER 02.03.2026
By efflux of time, the writ petition has becomeinfructuous, as the petitioner is said to have undergone the prescribed detention period while the writ petition waspending adjudication. Dismissed as rendered infructuous.
(RAHUL BHARTI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 02.03.2026 Bisma Jan.
151 Regular