Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31296 (JHR)

DOODH NATH TIWARY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/1035/2023 · 2025-03-03

Rongon Mukhopadhyay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt Case (Civil) No. 1035 of 2023 --- Doodh Nath Tiwary S/o Late Ram Nagina Tiwary, R/o Indrapuri, Road No. 6, PO Hehal, PS Sukhdeonagar, District Ranchi … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Rahul Purwar, Secretary, Higher Education & Technical Education, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, Jagarnathpur, Ranchi 3. Dr. Binod Kumar, Registrar, Ranchi University, Kotwali, Ranchi … … Opposite parties --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioner : None For the Opposite party nos. 1 & 2: Mr. Amrit Raj Kisku, AC to G.A. V For the Opposite party no. 3 : Mr. Anoop Kumar Mehta, Advocate --- 26/03.03.2025 None appears on behalf of the petitioner, though, Mr. A. K. Mehta, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 3 and learned AC to G.A. V appearing for the opposite party nos. 1 and 2 are present. This application has been preferred by the petitioner for initiating a contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for willful and deliberate violation of the order dated 27.03.2023 passed in W.P.(S) No. 2494 of 2021. A show-cause has been filed by the opposite party no. 2 from which it appears that the claim of the petitioner for grant of benefits of ACP and MACP has been rejected vide order dated 04.09.2024. So far as the benefits arising out of the 7th Pay Revision Commission is concerned, the show-cause filed by the opposite party no. 3 clearly reveals that a pay-order of Rs. 4,96,211/- in the name of the petitioner had been prepared way back on 04.03.2024 and as per Mr. Mehta, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 3, the amount must have been transferred to the account of the petitioner. In view of the aforesaid submission, the order dated 27.03.2023 passed in W.P.(S) No. 2494 of 2021 stands complied with. -2- The petitioner however is at liberty to challenge the order dated 04.09.2024 as contained in Memo no. 1457, if so advised before the appropriate forum. This contempt applications stands disposed of. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J) R Shekhar Cp 2