APHC010452862025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI •IV THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA I.A.Nos. 3 and 4 of 2025 IN/ AND CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8991 OF 2025 Between: Dalli Ravindra Reddy, S/o. Venkanna Aged 51 years, Hindu, CasteReddika Occ. Post Master, R/o. D No. 2-28, Post Office Street (BC-A), Guravaigudem, Eluru (Erstwhile West Godavari) District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High court of Andhra Pradesh. At Amaravathi. 2. Chundru Anusha, W/o Late Rama Krishna Aged 31 years, R/o Velagapadu Village, Eluru (Erstwhile West Godavari) District. ...Respondents Petition under Section 482of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS,2023, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court, The petitioner/Sole Accused further humbly prays that that this High Court may be pleased to quash all further proceedings in S.C.No.39 of 2025 on the file of V Addl. District and Session Judge cum Special Court for trail of offences against Women, Eluru. T:.. IA NO: 1 OF 2025 / Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased Under the circumstances stated above, that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy of S.C.No.39 of 2025 on the file of V Addl. District and the Charge Sheet in Session Judge cum Special Court for trail of offences against Women, Eluru, for the present, in the interest of justice. lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to grant interim stay of all further proceedings in S.C.No.39 of 2025 on the file of V Addl. District and Session Judge cum Court for trail of offences against Women, Eluru, including his Special appearance pending disposal of the main Criminal Petition. lA NO: 3 OF 2025 Between: Chundru Anusha, W/o Late Rama Krishna Aged 31 years, R/o Velagapadu Village, Eluru (Erstwhile West Godavari) District. ...Respondent / Petitioner / Complainant AND 1. Dalli Ravindra Reddy, Aged 51 years, Hindu, CasteReddika (BC-A), Occ. Post Master, R/o. D No. 2-28, Post Office Street Guravaigudem, Eluru (Erstwhile West Godavari) District, of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High court of Andhra Pradesh. At Amaravathi. 2. The State ...Respondent Petition under Section 320(6) & 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS R/w the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of 359(6) praying that in of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to accord Grounds and allow the Criminal Petition filed by permission to record the compromise the Petitioner/Accused by quashing all further proceedings in S.C No. 39 of 2025 on the file of the V Addl. District and Session Judge cum Special Court for trail of offences against Women, Eluru as against the Petitioner/ Sole Accused, on the ground of compromise as the de-facto complainant has no objection for the interest of justice lA NO: 4 OF 2025 Between: Chundru Anusha, W/o Late Rama Krishna Aged 31 years, R/o Velagapadu Village, Eluru (Erstwhile West Godavari) District. ...Respondent / Petitioner / Complainant AND 1. Dalli Ravindra Reddy, Aged 51 years, Hindu, CasteReddika (BC-A), Occ. Post Master, R/o. D No. 2-28, Post Office Street Guravaigudem, Eluru (Erstwhile West Godavari) District. 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High court of Andhra Pradesh. At Amaravathi. ...Respondent Petition under Section 320(2) & 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS R/w 359(2) praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to allow the Criminal Petition filed by the Petitioners/Accused by quashing all further proceedings in S.C No. 39 of 2025 on the file of the V Addl. District and Session Judge cum Special Court for trail of offences against Women, Eluru as the de-facto the ground of compronnise in the interest of justice. against the accused, on complainant has as objection for the same, in no ; SRI. K JYOTHI PRASAD : SRI P SHREE RAM ; PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Counsel for the Petitioner Counsel for the Respondents Counsel for the Respondents The Court made the following ORDER : APHC010452862025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA l A.Nos.a and 4 of 2025 [3396] WM IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8991/2025 Between: DALLI RAVINDRA REDDY, CASTEREDDIKA (BC-A), OCC. POST MASTER, R/0. D NO. 2-28, POST OFFICE STREET GURAVAIGUDEM, ELURU (ERSTWHILE WEST GODAVARI) DISTRICT. AGED 51 YEARS, HINDU, ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PUBLIC HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 1.THE PROSECUTOR, AMARAVATHI. 2 CHUNDRU ANUSHA, W/0 LATE RAMA KRISHNA AGED 31 ELURU (ERSTWHILE AT YEARS, R/0 VELAGAPADU VILLAGE, WEST GODAVARI) DISTRICT....RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.K JYOTHI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S); 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) has been filed by the / Accused, seeking to quash the proceedings against him in The instant Suraksha Sanhita, Petitioner 2 S.C.No.39 of 2025 on the file of the Court of V Additional District Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge for trial and of offences against Women, of Indian Penal Code (for short Eluru for the offence under Section 306 ‘IPC’). 2. I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 Sections 320(6) and 320(2) Cr.P.C read of BNSS respectively seeking permission to record the compromise between her and the 3. Petitioner / Accused and Respondent No.2 Court and were identified by their respective learned their Aadhar cards attested by their respective identification. are filed by Respondent No.2 under with Sections 359 (6) and 359(2) to compound the offences and Petitioner/Accused. appeared before this counsel. Copies of counsel are filed for proper 4. Both parties would submit that settlement for withdrawal of the they came to an amicable case in S.C.No.39 of 2025 on the file of the Court of V Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Specia l Judge for trial of offences against Women, Eluru pending between them and a Joint Memo is also filed to that effect. Respondent No.2 submits that, at the intervention of elders on both sides, the matter has been settled between the parties and she is not interested to prosecute the matter and that they compromised the matter and hence. the case may be closed. .f Considering the submissions, in the light of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and another\ in 5. terms of the mediation held between the parties, since there is an amicable settlement between them, I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the case against the Petitioner / Accused in S.C.No.39 of 2025 on the file of the Court of V Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge for trial of offences against Women, Eluru for the offence under Section 306 IPC, is hereby quashed. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ^ 2012(10)scc 303 SD/- K.TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The V Addl. District and Session Judge cum Special Court for trail of offences against Women, Eluru The Station House Officer, T Narasapuram Police Station, West Godavari District. One CC to Sri. K Jyothi Prasad Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri. P Shree Ram, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] Two CD Copies 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. PR TAC (ENCLOSING THE JOINT MEMO) HIGH COURT DATE0:04/09/2025 ORDER LA.Nos. 3 and 4 of 2025 IN/ AND CRIMIMAI PETITION NO: 8991 OF ?n9i; allowing the both I.A.NOS. 3 and 4 of 2025 IN/ AND CRIMINAL PETITION JOINT MEMO OF COMPROMISE FILED BY BOTH PARTIES It is humbly submitted that the petitioner in the above criminal petition is arrayed as Sole Accused in FIR No. 264 of 2020 of T. Narasapuram Police Station, West Godavari District for the offences under section 306 of I.P.C and subsequently the same was culminated into S.C No. 39 of 2025 on the file of the V Addl. District and Session Judge cum Special Court for trail of offences against Women, Eluru and the same is pending. The 2"^^ respondent herein the de-facto complainant in the above case. 1. IS 2. It is humbly submitted that the above Criminal Petition was filed seeking quash the proceedings in S.C No. 39 of 2025 on the file of the V Addl. District and Session Judge cum Special Court for trail of offences against Women, Eluru. O cV, vl It is humbly submitted that pending the above case between the partie^^ the elders interested on both sides intervened and settled the issue amicably v keeping the welfare and future of me and my children and to avoid further complications and court cases. In the settlement arrived between both the parties, it was agreed by the 2'^'^ respondent/de-facto complainant to co operate for the closure of the above case against the accused by giving necessary/required evidence, deposing required affidavits/petiti ons, appear before the concerned court or before any other court including this Hon ble Court on the dates on which her presence is required etc.. 3. It is humbly submitted that there was no coercion, inducement against the parties to settle the issue amicably. Particularly the 2"*^ respondent/de- facto complainant has agreed voluntarily for the closure of the above case. 4. It is humbly submitted that in view of the amicable settlement arrived between the parties, there is no purpose in keeping the above case pending for further time and the same is liable to be quashed by recording the settlement arrived between the parties. 5. Both parties agreed for closure of the case on the ground of amicable settlement between the parties out of the court. 6. The compromise arrived between the parties with their free will and 7. consent. This Joint Memo of Compromise has been prepared on our instructions and read over to us and we found them to be true and correct. Hence, it is humbly prayed that this Hon’ble court may be pleased to allow the Criminal Petition by quashing the S.C No. 39 of 2025 on the file of the V Addl. District and Session Judge cum Special Court for trail of offences VO (_- - gainst Women, Eluru, West Godavari District as against the Petitioner/ Sole /Accused, on the ground of compromise as the de-facto complainant has ■ -0^ / objection for the same. no :# w Counsel For the Petitioner/ Sole Accused Petitioner/ Sole Accused / / cU- De-facto Complainant Counsel For the De-facto Complainant I Amaravati. Date : 04-09-2025 i i f i I / j i I ! i ! ( i