Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 31295 (CHH)

ABID DHEBAR (PARTNER -M/S A D RICE INDUSTRIES) v. UNION OF INDIA

MCC/883/2025 · 2025-08-27

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:CGHC:43479 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No. 883 of 2025 Abid Dhebar (Partner -M/s A D Rice Industries) S/o Gaffar Dhebar, Aged About 35 Years R/o Ambedkarm Chowk, Ward No. 10, Gariyaband, Dist. Gariyaband (C.G.) Firms Address- Village- Saudholi, Gariyaband, Dist. Gariyaband (C.G.) ... Applicant versus 1 - Union Of India Through Deputy Secretary, Ministry Of Consumer Affairs, Food And Public Distribution Department Of Food And Public Distribution, Krishi Bhawan New Delhi. 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, New Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Managing Director Chhattisgarh State Market Federation Maryadit, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) 4 - C.G. State Civil Supplies, Corporation Limited, Gariyaband, District Gariyaband (C.G.) 5 - Collector (Food Department), Gariyaband, District Gariyaband (C.G.) 6 - District Marketing Officer, Department Of Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection, Gariyaband, District Gariyaband (C.G.) 7 - Food Corporation Of India (Fci), Regional Office- Mova, Vidhan Sabha Marg, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ---- Respondent For Applicant : None VASANT KUMAR Digitally signed by VASANT KUMAR Date: 2025.08.29 15:40:00 +0530 For Union of India : Mr. Rishabh Dev Singh, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Ramakant Mishra, DSGI For Respondent No.7 : Mr. R.S. Patel with Mr. Ashish Sahu, Advocates Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 28/08/2025 1. Since, there is no representation on behalf of the applicant even when the matter is called out in second round, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the case for want of prosecution. 2. Accordingly, the case is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Vasant